It would be required to also know where.
1 Like
But… It is Su-30 with R-77 on air intake pylon…
17 Likes
Yea, forgot the mention it before (speaking offcourse about the Inner Pylon)
If it can be confirmed as possible by an official source on active aircraft and on what pylon station, then its open to a suggestion report and down to the devs to decide.
2 Likes
Good :)
In this case, Time to Pray for an answer
1 Like
I literally posted that in the su27 thread and said it’s misleading lol, look carefully.
Single rack
That second r77 is on the intake pylon
14 Likes
Yeah, sure guy. Come back to me when the plane ends up overnerfed and underperforms massively because the whine never stopped even after it was corrected.
What the hell? Did Smin just say report it after sending a clear picture that it doesn’t have double rack???
it’s just misunderstanding. anyone can make mistakes
1 Like
That picture doesn’t show what you’re talking about. It shows one missile under each air intake and only single missiles in the “bay” between them, not dual-racks. It’s an optical illusion, so you just see what you want to see…
3 Likes
I’ve got bad news for you…
Anyone know about an ASRAAM block 4?
top tier air rb is more popular ?
i would pick the rafale over the su30sm any day in grb. i dont have top tier ground in french tt but i use the rafale in ground sim where u dont need to grind ground.
hellooooo eurofighter forum here
1 Like
Rafale in-game is F.3R, not F.3, the AESA is correct.
4 Likes
Censored already.
I would say this most peoples views of Tanks comes from games and media. T-90M and T-72B3 are currently having a rough time in a certain place. They are being outclassed by older “less advanced” NATO tanks. Ask anyone who knows nothing about tanks and they will tell you despite seeing 1000s of T-72 variants destroyed it is a superior tank to a Challenger 2 or maybe even an M1 tank.
Gaijin propagate this by making nothing Russia have at top tier rubbish. They gloss over T series tanks weaknesses, they add systems like LMUR and Kh-38 and they deny other nations of similar systems. They restrict the ammo NATO tanks can have and ground attack weapons and use the excuse balance.
And the reason for all this is partly yes Russia is a huge player base. But so is the US and Germany in terms of nations played in game. But looking at the companies dealings out with the sphere of content creators it looks like they are being financially incentivised to try and reduce the reputational damage the Russian armed forces has suffered in recent years. To reinforce the Russia strong ideal and to make anyone who plays this game online think that Russian tanks aren’t a generation behind NATO tanks but are their superiors and equals.
2 Likes
Nah i think youre overthinking this way too hard. Going for full realism would mean that either USSR players get wiped everytime or theyre excluded from the top BRs. Both would be bad for a big part of the playerbase and therefore Gaijins bottom line.
1 Like
So it’s all just for balance, you think teams of Mi 28s with LMURS and Kh-38 is for balance?
Gaijin’s bottom line is why they are doing it but not for the players enjoyment.
I would say look into it, look into who they sponsor.
Unironically yes, because i bet USSR teams will still barely clear 50% winrate even with broken CAS
which is exactly how they balance the game