Eurofighter Typhoon (UK versions) - Technical data and discussion (Part 2)

It’s really rare but I could swear I’ve seen it on some occasions.
The “SMALL” targets I’m talking about are invisible to the naked eye (I flew to some to find out what they were). You just fly past them and there’s nothing except air while they’re effectively standing in the air or slowly falling (like chaff). Or ghost targets are now detected and identified via NCTR :D

Anyway, as chaff should have a large RCS (larger than the plane carrying them) it’s curious that they’re displayed as “SMALL”.

Hmm… I always just assumed they were glide munitions. Interesting

there is no “bomb” in the NCTR list
image

3 Likes

Welp, so my memory is playing tricks on me.

It’s bombs being dropped by F-15s or Sukhois.

Sooooo idk if anyone’s seen this but BAEs proposal for a Eurofighter Typhoon Naval variant for India in 2011.

  • Thrust Vectoring

  • Tail Hook

  • New front landing gear

  • Increased AOA cockpit view

  • IRIS-T, ASRAAM, RBS-15 Mk4.



6 Likes

check post above this

IMG_6457
IMG_6455
IMG_6450
IMG_6442
IMG_6444

check post above this

1 Like

Cc @Morvran

typhoons with cfts look so bad

6 Likes

Thrust vectoring is cool though.

4 Likes

EJ230s already exist, just no one uses them. Was even a proposal for Gripen E to get them.

Technically already has one iirc.

Yeah, that is needed.

Intestesting

Also catapult from front nose gear or fuselage

Yes I’m sure I’ve seen Typhoons with tail hooks, I’m sure I’ve even seen a video of a typhoon land on an aircraft carrier with a tail hook I swear.

In-game yeah probably, but IRL its for emergency runway landings . Same reason the Tonka has one

First time I hear about a navalized EFT. I always assumed the front landing gear structure would be too weak to handle catapulting and hook arrested landings, at least not without some relatively major modification of the air intake

1 Like

It was proposed for the RN as well iirc, but was rejected because it would require such extensive re-design of the landing gear

1 Like

Yeah that makes sense. That’s one of the issue with this design of air intakes. Also the possible issue of FOD, idk if it’s that much of an issue on aircraft carriers but it looks like it’s a consequent danger on them as crews make 2 (?) sweeps of the deck everyday to check for them

1 Like

Cool eft

Has been sent

Oh sht my bad let me remove it