No, the at-speed thrust is 100% correct for both dry and wet.
Oh alright
so i’m assuming that this is what TWS+ is
as compared to the TWS_ESA
and i might be reading too much into this but “scanFinished”… i hope that doesnt mean finnish scaning the whole scan area
cuz if it does then that explains why it hasn’t improved TWS at all
So there’s a new bug with the radar, sometimes when locking and trying to fire a missile at someone it just doesn’t fire but the timer for impact is present.
This already happened to me twice, in GRB earlier today and it cost me a trade, and just now in a ARB match, i get “🗣️Lock🗣️Lock🗣️”, red tone, press launch, the timer for impact appears on my remaining missiles but no missile gets launched.
i’m a bit split on that one
EFT is clearly the worst at CAS, there’s not doubt about it. At the same time being a ground RB regular, i’d much rather have other planes CAS nerfed rather than EFT buffed.
In the current meta though, brimstones vs KH38, or hell even AASM ir, is laughable. Facing both in a SPAA is completely different
3 Likes
worst* currently
oops typo
1 Like
Its only going to get worse, Gripen E will have the hard points to carry 120s and AGM 65s
Leaving Typhoon as the only top tier jet without FnF capabilities
Not great not terrible
so yeah
TWS+ merely matches the tracks once after each full scan is complete (so every vertical bar)
meaning it does NOT do DAS or revisits
Playing Eurofighter right now is a waste of time.
No it’s not, stop coping
It is my opinion. You are of course free to disagree I will however play Flankers, Rafale and others in the meantime.
Ok 👍
I mostly want it’s CAS fixed for other gamemodes. Like ASB. At the moment Brimstones on the typhoon and GR4 are completely worthless. 0 point to even consider bringing them in that gamemode
1 Like
it would be brimstones “too broken” , meanwhile kh38 exists and can be fired from 20km.
Nor do you get your inner pylon aim120s even though 5 manuals says it can because double standards, & its funny since Su30 having double rack r-77 never existed
1 Like
or maybe they used this diagram ^^^ but its literally the same situation as this:
really shows the double standards
Well… They are specifically talking about the LOAL mode, which would be incredibly powerful, but they wrote that entire passage as if the option was either SAL or LOAL. Instead there is a third mode of operation which would function as LOBL. Which would have none of the issues which they described in that post.
Maybe MMW would be too strong, but I doubt it. Im of the opinion the MMW would be no stronger than the IOG we already have on most missiles and you can simply add the smoke with chaff within it if you are really concerned about that.
What 5 manuals?
Yeah… Would love to see their proof of this.
Do Brimstones need a quantity mitigation? Yes. 6 would be more than enough inside GRB, but I would want it done in a way that uncaps them in air modes.
But not only the sheer lack of any FnF for them sucks, but renders them a waste of space in ASB. Better off with the PW4s and then ontop of that, they dont even give Brimstone 2s. Which would actually be half decent even with SAL only.
I have long had the feeling that the snail brings the parameters of the aircraft to reality, or to how they understand it. But at the same time, they do not care at all about the fact that half of the systems in the aircraft are not implemented and that these systems that it implemented are designed to work together with the systems that it did not implement, in order to have sufficient efficiency at the beginning of the 21st century, and not at the end of the 80s.
I take it back, more like company data sheet specifications