Yes. Just saying what gaijin means by it.
1 Like
Then if there’s 0 drift then it functionally operates like what the bug report suggests, at that point, is there any issue?
I mean 4km, as in the range where the seeker picks up the laser. It is 4750 or something like that. Outside of that range the bomb will not pick up the laser.
The desired result of my report would have essenetially eliminated the paveway IV having a limited range in which the laser can be used to update the target. Currently you drop them from 7-8km (for the sake of a number) and want to update the target, you have to wait for them to get within about 4km from the target before being able to update the target. With this change, it wouldnt matter where the bomb was in free fall.
But there are issues with it updating all bombs in free fall without a way to select which bomb you want to edit (which I reckon is within the capabilies to model) or by making it just affect the last bomb dropped.
However denying the report because they dont model “man-in-the-loop” bombs on a bomb with “man-in-the-loop” already. Is just kinda insane :D
1 Like
What the bug reporter wants, is update the GNSS part of the guidence, so outside of the 4750m laser range, so for example you drop a IV from lets say 6km, and you can update it all the time
1 Like
does the Typhoon have that datalink HMD ? in real life ?
Plus i haven’t yet seen a gun lead on the Typhoons HUD in Sim and its hard for me to aim sometimes
Plus thermals in the HMD
Plus the tint on the Hud doesn’t exist meaning you don’t see anything if it is bright out side or from your HMD in Sim
and we still have problems with SRH speed on the radar plus IRST is missing modes and range
but wait there is more …(the snail) … Noooo
ask gijin where it is, I made a bug report a month ago adressing that but no reaction.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/WYDSrC24X8sY
I probably have to make a new bug report on the EEGS
I dont think we will see that anytime soon and Iam not even sure if the Striker 1 HMSS has that feature.
Who would want to see their HUD anyways, it is not like there is important information on it right?
2 Likes
Exactly there is no need to see the Su27 SM in front of me lunching missiles at me and not knowing its position and who is friendly or not in front of me why would i ever need that ++++ XDDD
Especially when it is a Stalingrad sunny day with snow there the typhoons awareness is amazing the HUD is completely invisible its like i turned it off XDDDDDDD
plus the fact that the Typhoons MAW is so crazy that i cant tell what is a flair and what is a missile
Well urelated to that I made a bug report on the missing lead indecator.
@Gunjob @WaretaGarasu
sorry to ping you but it would be nice if you could forward this bug report on the EEGS:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jPRgK6FGgZsj
2 Likes
on the contrary thank you, I will support this report
It does, i think. HUD for sure does.
Based on the PIRATE 2002 brochure, it seems it does
1 Like
Forwarded.
4 Likes
is he using a HMD Striker I or II ?
on 4:09 time
OMG, he alive :)
2 Likes
Tyhpoon uses sensor fusion to display an amalgamation of friendly and target data from all available data sources simultaneously. Considering the Typhoon HMD already provides friendly and hostile HMD overlays if the radar is on, it would stand to reason that it should be able to display friendlies with datalink when the radar is offline just like the Rafale, but the Rafale gwts to be a special snowflake jet that gets datalink while no other fighter jets get it ingame because;
- Gaijin are liars
- Gaijin doesnt understand that the friendly overlay in the HMD functions off datalink, instead assuming it works on the power of friendship and rainbows
2 Likes
That is WAY too OP to be modeled currently. Imagine the disaster if teams started working together
The problem isnt proving the HMD can display friendly targets, the Striker I HMD alreqdy does it ingame, the problem is the Typhoon needs to have its radar on to do it ingame as it relies solely on the radar while the rafalr gets datalink HMD displays despite gaijins assertion that tactical datalinks do not exist in-game.
By all accounts, if held to the same standard as the Rafale, the Typhoon should have HMD IFF even with the radar off, but only the Rafale is allowed special treatment.
and A-10C and Mirage 2000 RMV
Pls gib Scorpion/ IFF HMD for EF :(
I wonder, when are new Updates coming which fix EF Issues :(
Feels like an eternity since the last one