Narrow scan is the only one to use now, or your shots are just wasted. the issue is you are blind to anything outside that small area infront of your aircraft :(
Skins are in. We got the battle of britain one.
Narrow scan is what you’re supposed to use against manoeuvring targets. Wide scan is for very long range shots against targets that aren’t trying to defend.
I dont have the Typhoon yet but for the Gripen im exclusively in Narrow scan TWS 37km,19km and HMD PD mode The R-Darter is a close range missile the jet works best in that capacity.
Can we unlock the WW2 skin or is that the GE one?
Both are unlockable. 380pts for the BoB one, 770pts for the demonstration camo. Game doesn’t appear to be counting previous kills in the jet towards either camo but it’s not like it’s hard to score kills in this thing so it’s a minor gripe.
Did Germany get the JG-53 Hartmann tribute Typhoon skin?
RAF Typhoon vs Luftwaffe Typhoon vs F-15E all in their WW2 skins
Scan speed. And detection is about the same. On 3 decades younger system. Given it should be able to revisit targets like pesa or aesa can. We should have mechanic to designate 6 tws targets that will be constantly updated whenever abtenna passes their azimuth even if they are outside of scan vertically, multiple sources support that and even manual, sadly, cant use manual.
Already this function points at insufficient scan speed of 65deg/s as it cant keep constant TWS refresh rate coupled with jumping outside of pattern to up to 6 targets. Not like refresh speed matters given there is gamebreaking bug affecting every top tier radar set.
Your radar probably catches missiles momentarily and TWS doesn’t have the speed to “refresh” so your lock stays in that last place missile was detected for a while. Detecting/tracking missiles in TWS is a problem in some aircrafts imo. Tracking missiles are a bit too easy at the moment I’d say.
They did not. Gallery of all the EF skins below to avoid cluttering this page.
Already a report in for the Data Adaptive Scanning (Priority Track). Didn’t need the manuals.
Well unless you’ve got a figure for the scan speed (that’s not classified…) then its not changing.
We have one with over 300° per second.
Its a Hartmann tribute, Italian ones look great too they nailed it :)
I know… And it was forwarded as “suggestion” god damn MAIN function to deliver amraams and its suggestion. This should have been on dev server already or in fix where rafales aesa got fixed. Not suggestion.
It is forwarded as a suggestion because it would be a completely new mode in game. I can guarantee you there won’t be any differences if it was a suggestion or bug. Developers will look at it when possible just like every report that gets accepted and forwarded to them.
So that’s its then people, pack your things and go home…
Really looking forward to the limbo of bug reports that are rejected for not having a good enough source that we’re gonna have over the next 6-12 months - while the typhoon’s radar in game is worse than the Tornado F3
Just give the Captor M the Foxhunter stats and be done with it
By what measure is it worse? Just scanning speed? is that seriously it?
I mean scan speed is a big factor.
The higher scan speed would make it a lot easier to find target and to track them with TWS
Given how wt plays and what matters most, yeah kinda. I genuinely prefer hprf only fox hunter over copy pasta blue vixen. If we atleast had ability to designate own scan width like real ef can but we are limited there too.
You can change radar scale and get a faster scanning speed.