Nope.
Thank god.
Lyakh he, from Poland…
@Gunjob any idea if the EFT and F-16C are getting HMD IFF or is the Rafale the only one thats gonna get blessed with that in-game?
I know the F-16C missing said feature has been bug reported and accepted 3 months ago, but we havent heard a peep about that in the dev server changelog, and I dont even think the EFT has a bug report for it…
Don’t know yet sorry.
All good, ty. I hope the french arent the only ones that are going to get that feature, as its kind of a big deal, and definitely not a uniquely french system, so them being the only ones to get it on a fighter is incredibly annoying.
Currently they both only operate GBU-48 with Typhoon. The enhanced version of GBU-16 which used a 1000lb Mk.83 warhead.
If they adopt a 500lb bomb for Typhoon it’s more likely to be a guidance kit for Mk.82 warhead that Germany and Italy already use for JDAMs on Tornado - either integrating JDAM itself on Typhoon (currently the most likely), or buying GBU-49 Enhanced Paveway kits (outside chance of GBU-73, which is a Lockheed version of GBU-49 rather than Raytheon).
Paveway IV is an all-up weapon with its own warhead design, fuse, arming system - it just uses the same aerodynamic form as GBU-12/GBU-49. Similar to how Brimstone uses the aerodynamic form as Hellfire. The differences Paveway IV offers over GBU-49 aren’t really modelled in War Thunder.
you need a better computer mate, these graphics from the ground are pain.
nice tho
do you know if we will see a acceleration in 90° climb any soon? at the moment you lose speed all the time with stock setup and full fuel
That’s a game issue not my PC haha. Ground textures are very hit and miss on on RB maps.
I’ve got a very capable PC;
Spoiler
AMD Ryzen 7800X3D / Corsair H100i Platinum
AMD 7900XTX (Asus reference card)
Aorus B650 Elite AX
32GB Corsair Vengeance RGB @ 6000mhz CL30
1 TB Corsair MP600 NVME Gen4
1 TB WD Black NVME Gen3
1 TB Intel 660P NVME Gen3
1 TB Crucial MX400 SATA
Corsair HX1000
Corsair 680x
LG 27" Freesync Premium IPS 4k 144hz HDR400 (27GR93U)
LG 27" Freesync IPS 4k 60hz
Stock will never be as capable as FM’s aren’t tuned to stock performance only spaded.
thx for the quick response, but in test flight is the reference not the spaded setup?
Yes, but you asked about “stock setup”.
I’m back to haunt you @Gunjob, would the MAWS suggestion mentioned earlier fall under interface or gameplay?
sorry my mistake
i mean the two aim9 and two aim120 not the mods for the flight Performance
ohhh errm yeah its kinda both, go with Gameplay.
Hm… Not good, but ok
IMHO, betting on 6 thermal missiles will only make sense if they are ASRAAM. I don’t see any point in changing 2 AMRAAM for 4 9M, especially considering that these are not the same 9M that were a year ago.
Improved textures, as was promised in the response to the ticket I made yesterday
One problem with it though - ZK437 is a Tranche 3 Typhoon FGR.4, so IRL has bumps for mounting CFTs
ZK437 (Tranche 3) front, ZK314 (Tranche 2) middle, ZK377 (Tranche 3) rear
same for germany the squadron number is a t3a plane, gajin realy choose the weird /wrong models but oh well
The optimal loadout is probably 4+5 fit. The 6th AMRAAM probably isnt going to make a significant difference when fighting in BVR, but doubling your IR missiles when you go WVR could be very valuable.