It isn’t slander though if it’s true? Did you not submit a report that had nerfed the Rafale on December 10th even though a key aspect of the report had been reverted?
The question was not, “Is the report valid?” On many aspects the Eurofighter reports which are regarded as “nerfs” have been valid as well. People are not complaining if it’s valid, but they’re complaining about why people are focusing/nitpicking nerf reports. It would only be right to point out that most of us would not care about Eurofighter at all if it had not been for you.
You ignored my question can the Rafale pull 15G fully loaded?
Why was the report actioned by Gaijin to nerf the Typhoons G limit to 12G
When Rafale is allowed to keep 15G+
This is why we get frustrated, no one is actioning accepted Typhoon reports
We have had 3 dev servers a live patch 3 months of having a broken jet, another 3 dev servers another patch and all they did was nerf the flight characteristics and not fix the Radar.
Fair enough, it has not been reverted as of yet. But the question was why “French mains were nerfing Eurofighter”. I only am telling them that it isn’t as one-sided as they make it seem.
No Rafale can’t pull 15G fully loaded. I don’t think they nerfed the G-limit of Eurofighter, but rather they reduced the amount of AoA that can be pulled by the wings if the canards remained static. It may be as a result of source materials from a previously rejected report:
What’s hilarious they made these changes to the FM which now make it under perform even more despite bug reports from 3 months ago saying it should perform better. It still performs worse than the prototype with weaker engines in ITR and STR
