Arrogance only serves when you’ve facts on your side. The listed armament can be employed from well outside of 30km with the new mechanics introduced this update, which they have done. It does not matter that there are differences in execution, in practice this is the effect.
Good thing we have cruise missiles in game then, isn’t it? Specifically kh 59 and AGM 84. So something that is “basically a cruise missile” will fit right in.
Got to love how the addition of Grom 1 made the stale nature of the game modes evident but instead of revamping the game mode, those of us fond of air to ground lost a nice weapon.
We already explained the peoblem is not the range, not so hard to read for a bit.
Agm84 and kh59 only able to guide one at a time. Not to forget they lose lock most of the time. As you may be away they are anti ship seekers rather then anti tank.
Comparing the 2 of them to tge Brimstone is just absurd and is definitely not the same weapons nor have the same period of technology as there at least 5 year in technology difference.
But still you can always show me your 30km+ with either kh59 or agm84.
Focusing on my accent/grammar rather than my point says more about your arguments than mine. But true as i am not a english speaker so i wont mind your little juvenile game.
Now back to the topic, as i said the spear ir / sal / gnss are more needed and need to be added to support cas to certain planes.
But as you can see hopefully, the current cruise missile have no gnss. So if you can launch at a target from 50km or more. You need to be high, who in most cases get you killed right away or if you succeed to launch your loadout, they will be shot down.
And of course talking about the Brimstone seeker not being implemented was not my intention from the beginning or to be against it. So much about misunderstanding the whole conversation.
Rejecting? Yes i did Reject it as your asking it as if it will only come to you.
Your brining a whole new type of weapons to the game and you think your the only one that will get it ? Interesting behavior.
I take no issue with your grammar. I take issue with your comprehension, or ability to understand the information presented to you. Your not being an English speaker does not excuse you from being unable to parse the information or hold consistent positions. Just as being an English speaker does not excuse a person from it.
I couldn’t engage in French or German, be utterly wrong, and then point to my substandard grasp of the language to claim I should be permitted to be wrong. That is delusional.
And this frustration is demonstrated here. You yet again refer back to it being a class of weapon it is not, purely to make the case of rejecting it. You yet again defer to “Others don’t have it so you shouldn’t have it”. This is not introducing a new class of munition to the game. It is a longer ranged companion to gbu 53, but with none of the target tracking. Comparably long ranged munitions already exist, and they happen to also be able to track targets. Which again, this doesn’t.
Oh, and they have a warhead capable of consistently destroying targets. But I’m sure you’ll point to it basically being a cruise weapon and we’ll be back where we started.
Put the shovel down, stop digging. You don’t have to out yourself as opposed to it purely for the sake of it. I really can’t be bothered explaining simple concepts to you again, only for you to go back to an earlier point in the discourse. Your choice to be wrong is yours.
" every should come at the same time rather then one at a time which will result is interesting reactions from the community. Taking exemple the usa main when ls6 / spice bombs got added. "
I feel like we’re not talking about the same weapons here.
All my points was about turbo jet powered spears.
But if says that its a companion to gbu53, then you surely are talking about the glide variants.
As gbu53 is not a jet powered.
is ir and sal mode with the MITL not able to track target ?
Ok…?
