It probably will perform identical to the Captor-M right now
Isn’t the Catcher M considered the best performing electronically scanned radar? The current in-game performance is really not flattering
Captor-M is often considered the best mechanically scanned radar but ingame I would take the APG-65 from the F-4F ICE any day of the week
2 Likes
Oh yes, Catcher M is a mechanical scanning radar (a mistake caused by typing too fast), so can the Typhoon be considered ruined by Gaijin’s bad Catcher M (forgive me for my bad English, this is the translator used)
Can someone please explain how i got killed by a fox-3 when i was 25m above the ground and I was chaffing. (wasnt chaffing in the gif but was beffore i was hit)
Looks like marketing lies
8 Likes
It would have been coming from a much higher angle. The higher the angle, the less of a difference multipathing makes. It could have also just hit the building bringing the explosion closer to you.
Or just some other shenanigans
4 Likes
Always with western tech. Only facts when its russian.
Yup, to defeat multipathers, shoot a fox3/1 at them head on from like 3-8ish km out at like a 60 degree upwards angle. the missile will multipath top down, which lets them proxy
3 AMRAAMS got launched at you from high alt, Multipathing kicked in at the very last second to avoid direct impacts and you got smacked by a mixture of them proximity detonating on you and smacking into the houses you were overflying. The third missile (which hit after you were killed) came down directly on top of you and was a direct impact.
Until they fix the radar this plane will remain mid. In sim, it’s like your flying blind. I would legit rather have any other radar. It reminds me of the fucking mig29. You cant even guide in your fox 3’s because the instant the opponent shoots a missile it switches targets to the missile. Hud is still broken in vr too. Likely to remain broken.
Hello
As we have already mentioned, the devs are continuing to work through the reports concerning the Eurofighter and the fixes will keep rolling wherever it is possible. Equally several key radar / IRST issues have been raised again in the feedback which impact multiple aircraft and not just Eurofighter.
This report however:
Has nothing to do with EFT or this topic.
I am serious. Considered by who? In what metrics? How much better?
1 Like
Ah, free abrams type of memes. It’s been a while~~
West can’t have anything better than Reds I supposed
So far we have, wait for pesa flankers to arrive… those radars will be better than anything on EF i bet.
Hi, @Smin1080p_WT,
My request is to simply push them higher up the queue, as sometimes crucial issues that might not initially appear as such often end up too far back in the queue. Especially, the first two bugs, as they require a single line to be changed. The exact same bug for ground radars was changed within 3 months, yet airborne radars are still stuck with it for almost 8, despite them having identical fixes, and the bug being a much bigger problem for them too.
Can it at least be changed to a bug instead of a suggestion. An underperformance of of 2 - 10 times in range does not deserve being called a suggestion.
Likewise, can this bug in the very least be accepted? Or would you prefer the players buy a magnifying glass to use the IRST on their new and shiny Typhoons and Rafales?
1 Like
Something being a suggestion or bug has no bearing on its importance. Both are treated equally in that regard. Its simply how reports that concern a source based point of view that can conflict with other sources (historical reports etc) are classified. So it currently has the correct classification.
I’m calling it
Clearly, suggestions and reports are treated differently.
Also, why is the first Su-27 IRST report just forwarded, but the second one is now a suggestion, despite both of them being based on sources?
First:
Second:
It couldn’t possibly be that the second report was forwarded as a suggestion, because the developer is expected to have the same answer to it as the first one, could it? (first report didn’t really fix much)
The only few other times I had a bug report labeled as a suggestion was for reports that used historical information for features that might seem like they are currently not present in the game.
If you want to see examples of historical reports that were not labeled as suggestions, you are welcome to check my bug reporting profile, there are plenty of them.
Lastly, it seems awfully convenient that the word suggestion is used for both historical inaccuracies and for suggestions for future additions. Why not use clear language here?
1 Like
Not the case. Suggestion vs Bug is a simple classification of how the issues are tagged internally.
Bug: Unintended Issue with the game (Technical, Gameplay, graphics etc)
Suggestion: Suggested change based off information, sources or suggesting missing munitions etc
Something being passed as a suggestion or bug has no bearing on its importance. Things are further internally tagged to distinguish between what may be a historical error for example vs simple missing ordinance. Things can change classification if a developer confirms it should one way or another.
There is no need. The report is labelled correctly as it is. This is simply a misunderstanding of how reports are passed and handled as people commonly misunderstand that a suggestion is not treated “less than” a bug.
If you have further issues or discussion on this matter, then this should be taken to PM.
I will once again remind you for the second time, this is a Eurofighter topic, not an Su-27 or Pantsir topic and this has no relevance to this topic anymore. Your initial questions were answered already.