You made your point already, there isn’t one, it’s outright worse
1 Like
It’s limited to Mach 2.2 because that’s the speed at which RAM damage occurs, 1.7 is superCRUISE speed so it’ll be fine
Hopefully the Mod who made the statement sees this :D and could provide more context for us.
All CCs are engaging with same playebase pool. Which is mostly full of people with sub 1:0 KD - noobs.
If they had to face actually competent people in BVR, they would have hard time. But guess, in sims? These people are usually on their side as they tend to fly against spam of US teams.
Killing average US main joe aint nothing special.
And most people in 23s were dying. Guess why its 11.3 in sim and J/S is 12.0 and face these like once a week.
1 Like
Britain was the only nation out of the 3 who bought and installed LWR for typhoons. Just incase you start asking why Germany doesn’t have it
Yes but i don’t know why we didn’t see another compare between the two after 2012 .
Mmmmm, I don’t think so, because you know better than me that the Rafale was designed for omnirole tasks (just to clarify, the Rafale doesn’t have air-to-ground missiles because, as is well known, they are not as precise as the AASM), while the Typhoon was built primarily for air superiority.
As examples of missions the Rafale can perform but the Eurofighter Typhoon cannot:
- Nuclear Deterrence
- Aircraft Carrier Operations
- Simultaneous Multirole Missions
We could also add the fact that the Rafale can carry more weight than the Typhoon as well.
No, still need F-18 it won’t even push the meta it looks cool though.
If we consider Germany the baseline Typhoon
Italy Gains IRST
Britain gains IRST and LWR (also the better looking camos :P )
Waste of dev resources for now, you can wait in line with the ww2 prototype queue
i’m buying a premium to finish britain just for the blackjack skin, never thought I would see that in wt lol
1 Like
Itll be a good 13.3 or 7, would offer different play style to F-16 with amazing low speed handling, and if it’s a USMC one it has a lot of weapons options
The MLD has been substantially nerfed and the 7F has been substantially buffed since the time im referring to. Thats why the MLD is now 11.3 in sim and the 4J/S are 12.0.
Also, you’re argument is just “i dont like what the CC’s say so nothing you can say will convince me they might be right”
The M2K5F wasnt doing amazing because all french pilots are cracked out of their mind 300 iq aces of aces as they like to pretend. They were doing well cuz the plane is crazy good and nearly perfectly fits WT. The Rafale just expands on everything that made the M2K5F great ingame.
I still think 11.3 is an insane BR for it considering its still one of the fastset and best equipped aircraft of that BR. but that is a debate for another thread
Because there hasn’t been a competition in which they directly faced off since then…?
Mmmmm, I don’t think so, because you know better than me that the Rafale was designed for omnirole tasks.
Makes next to no sense, but anyways, I’ve got to agree. Eurofighter isn’t an Omni-role aircraft (so my bad), it is however, an excellent Multi-role design, in terms of A2A & A2G, on top of SEAD/DEAD (upcoming T5s), it outshines the Rafale, especially once we factor in the latest Tranches like the Luftwaffe’s T4 or UK’s, and you wouldn’t believe, FGR.4 (they really gotta name it something else by now…) due to bigger (not necessarily heavier) loadouts - I mean, you aren’t gonna try’n’argue that having 6xAASM is the same as having 6 - 12x Brimstone 2/3s and 2 - 4 GBUs on top, are ya? The sheer quantity is on the Eurofighter’s side.
(just to clarify, the Rafale doesn’t have air-to-ground missiles because, as is well known, they are not as precise as the AASM), while the Typhoon was built primarily for air superiority
And how do you know “air-to-ground missiles” (in this case, Brimstones & SPEAR 3s) aren’t as precise as the AASM…?
Britian really doesnt like renaming things unless we REALLY have to :P
Its cockpit is turbo bad as well tbf. My friends tried playing it the other day and got so mad at flying in that flying casket they categorically refused to play the same BR again lol
and guess how average guy does in it… majority of people i meet in battle are sub 1:0…
It doesnt matter. Only case where you see what is better is if you get same skill people.
Not CC who spends half of his free time and dedication to the game vs some 14yo kid that came from school after being bullied and beaten by dad for bad grades.
CCs opinions means big nothing to me as they are super skewed and biased.
No we dont know that and we cant find actual credible documents. This issue
Yes we can hypothesise and based on US pilot reports but you will never find RCS tests data
And flight performance :(
The M2K’s are also highly praised by tournement players last I checked.
Nobody thinks the M2K or MICA is bad in-game except french mains.
I personally I hate the FGR2s cockpit, so its not really much better :D