The Italian and UK typhoons still have the integrated targeting camera
Yeah bc they can use the irst as a targeting camera
The German EF doesn’t have an irst
This is nothing but claim, there is no sufficent evidence that shows EFT can carry A2A missiles on those pylons.
There is also no evidence that clearly says it can’t.
So can we stop now bc this isn’t going anywhere
1 Like
But if you notice the position of the integrated camera, it’s UNDER the fuselage
Old reports are being forgotten, that’s why there isnt a lot of trust by the community.
That’s bc gaijin modeled it wrong
Then stop it with your empty claims,so far you showed nothing but made empty claims.
Same for you, like I said this is going nowhere
So you understand that those shouldn’t be removable, but you can’t comprehend that the EF can use its Irst as a targeting camera?
Unlike you i dont make empty claims, there are zero sufficent evidence that shows EFT can carry A2A missiles on those pylons, not to mention none of those operational EFT’s are armed with A2A missiles on those pylons which clearly indicates its not meant for a2a role.
Either find sufficient evidence that shows EFT can carry A2A missiles on those pylons or stop wasting times.
We have Su-25 with kh38MT. There is no sufficient evidence it can carry it at all.
well the evidence is that the pylon has all the suficient hardware to mount MFRLs…
I was confused why there is a camera coming from under the fuselage, not that I can’t comprehend it you jackass
Oh look a mockup with couple paper design that shows possibilites without sufficient evidence, in that case we should make bug report about Rafale cause according to some diagrams and mockups it can carry 10 missiles.
You dont even know what sufficient evidence means…
Are those plyons are cleared for A2A missiles? is there any photo or official documents that support this claim? If not then it will just be another assume.