Yeah typo.
It’s 1/1 for turbine.
I didn’t say anything about a 0.4 compression ratio.
This is all talk and yet there is no substance to it. You don’t know what you’re talking about. The documentation shown clearly defined the EJ200 as was supported by the data from kensai16. When supercruise performance was added as a consideration for the research paper they noticed that the requirements for the British fighter aircraft actually caused them to incorporate an engine that left more to be desired when it came to supercruise performance. They posed that future engine designs could improve on various areas of performance and how.
What does the high bypass ratio have to do with a low pressure ratio? Did you read what was shown? The pressure ratio is akin to the other engine designs, which is problematic because a higher pressure ratio is desired to overcome the additional friction from subsonic bypass air entering the exhaust from the larger bypass ratio.
It required a combination of excellent subsonic (0.8 mach) cruise SFC and supersonic re-heat SFC at ~1.8 mach and 36k feet. These combinations required a higher bypass ratio and as a consequence diminished supercruise capability.
It was shown in the documentation that the pressure ratio will not exceed 30 and the T3 temp will not exceed 900 degrees K which is exactly as shown in the documentation using supercruise as an additional discriminator wherein the EJ200 style engine was not capable of pushing a conventional style fighter not optimized for wave drag past ~1.45 mach even with absurd SOT increases such as 2100K+
Again, nonsense. What are you writing?
What is the nonsense for? What is the purpose? How do you reduce compression and increase pressure at the same time?
why is the ignore option not available to profiles that are hidden? seems like an oversight, now I must suffer through someone’s spam.
Why were TWS ground targets removed based on?
And did the F4F iCE get its 9Li-1s?
No, still the normal AIM-9L/i
i checked live maybe i missread but it was the -1
It’s only nonsense because you have no idea how a turbine functions and can’t seem to understand that design intent varies wildly between engines based on what airframe they are intended to be fitted to.
-
All pressure ratios listed in the performance specification for turbine engines are for static operation ONLY, unless otherwise stated.
-
In flight, the pressure ratio WILL increase relative to the airspeed due to ram effect: The forward motion of the aircraft compresses the air before the air even reaches the first stage compressor.
1 Like
nvm thats about the F-4F ICE
i cant read then
Will you be doing new reports on 9Li-1 for F4F ICE? After all, they added them to EFT, so it’s not a problem for them to copy them and transfer them to the phantom.
honestly the ICE is better of with the basic Li, at least while it stays at 13.0
i dont think a smokeless motor will change BR
It no longer has ground radar?
1 Like
No
Why is the radar of the Typhoon still so bad？
1 Like
Does anyone know if the devs will anytime soon implement pyrophoric flares? These would be effective against modern seekers with IRCCM too by creating an IR wall between the missile and the plane if used right. Asking here because the BOLs of the EF use only pyrophoric flares (except for the ones in the COBHAM dispenser) AFAIK.
2 Likes
To be completely honest (at least in RB) 9L/i with smoke is a good way to fool your enemies and make them think you fired an AMRAAM at closer ranges. If they’re not experienced players or don’t pay attention to rwr they usually eat the missile while trying to “notch” it.