buddy, the problem is that gajin until now was to lazy to model the bol pods
U did a report for the general effectiveness of the BOL, do you might want to redo your report in regards to the euros? this might the devs to actualy give it a quicker look
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ba4AJaRzkatr
And here @Flame2512 one which could be redone
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/B8OvCzjZ7E91
1 Like
It’s worse than the Gripens radar isn’t it? But PS/05-A is based on Blue Vixen and older, smaller, less powerful etc.
I believe the BOL for the EF2000 is built in with its MAWs.
From what I understand, at the moment, The Gripen litereally have C&P Blue Vixen. IRL it was basically the same but given some upgrades like A2G modes
but at the moment, Id say CAPTOR-M is worse than Blue Vixen
I fumbled my copy pasta
1 Like
Eurofighter engines to inefficent and it can carry less fuel as it is capable of
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/AHYRsAEEOTAk
2 Likes
Eurofighter Empty wheigt is too much
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/KbIB6sqrdCeI
2 Likes
Pretty ceerain thats already a report
What? First off the EJ200s have a TSFC of 1.83 in WT currently.
10820kgf x2 21640. This uses 660kg/min. x60 that’s 39600kg/h.
1.83 TSFC.
5970kgf x2 = 11940kgf.
You claim 158,12kg/min. x60 that’s 9487kg per hour.
9487 / 11940kgf is a TSFC of 0.794.
The dry thrust fuel consumption is correct.
Anyone know if it should have an HMD IFF like the Rafale or the A-10C?
I beleive so, but HMD is a massive WIP at the moment, so will probably have to wait for live for that
According to what
According to this:
Here are the screenshots:
1 minute recording, 660kg used.
Here’s a NASA page about the equation:
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/airplane/sfc.html
1 Like
I saw the math, what is the source suggesting that it should be 1.8
Oh, that’s what you were asking.
One of Eurojet’s PDFs.
Also my bad, reheat TSFC is supposed to be 1.7ish, not 1.8.
Dry thrust TSFC is correct though.
At a TSFC of 1.7, 21640kgf should return an hourly fuel use of 36788, or 613kg per minute.
1 Like
No because Gunjob made a way better one at or around the same time that I did that one. I also have no idea what making another report would do realistically without being labeled as a duplicate.
1 Like