airframe drag itself seems okay, the induced drag/wing effieciency is not good enough at all, sustained rate is too low as is total loft/instant rate
Why german and italian eurofighter hasn’t LWR? British have.
Because only we payed for it to be fitted.
Suspended wepaonary is always down to the developers discretion.
In the case of IRST, it’s one of the main distinguishing features between the Typhoons.
Its possible to submit suggestions for other airframe variants or modifications on the forum.
What does this mean in layman’s terms
lol one more “balance”
yak-141 moment
Basically the wing doesnt make enough lift per unit drag. Meaning our sustained rate is too low, and our maximum turn rate is also too low
No, it doesn’t seem okay. The airframe drag is too high otherwise the somewhat correct (slightly overperforming) afterburner thrust would allow 2.3 mach at altitude.
Perhaps it needs a small adjustment sure, but the extremeties of the thrust curve is comedic currently.
It needs a large adjustment to the drag and also a larger adjustment to the thrust curve. Both need to go down.
TYPO!!!
:P
Indeed, i dont think the fusalage drag needs to go down by a huge amount however. The lift is what im most concerned by for the current fm
I just asked how to make a suggestion for the German EF to get a pirate as a modification, but got told no because it is German? How do I make a suggestion if people tell me I can’t make one?
Suggest they add the airframe with Pirate, not that they add Pirate to this airframe.
Agree to disagree
We are currently missing 4-5°/s of sustained rate on tiffy.
Are we referring to Brimstones here?
IRST is what is being refered here
brimstone is used by germany
I know! That’s why it was so conserning! I thought they were gunna take away muh brimstonez!
If the sulfur stone of the German Typhoon fighter is removed, then it would be a good replacement.https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4w2eCvrlJd8y