There’s also F-16A and ADF being added in same patch. Mig-29 9.12 was added after Mig-29 9.13 too. Let’s not forget Mig-23 MLD/MLA/ML situation. I’m fairly certain there are some early jets/props being added after their more modern versions.
There’s no such rule.
They changed the A because they weren’t on par despite them being identical eventually as the A models were upgraded to what the C would be. Again it wouldn’t have been a problem if gaijin had added the A when the F16C was added. It was an artificial problem gaijin created same thing with the mig 23ML and mig 29 being added to germany and update later despite them not being that different. Now if the MLD was added the same time germnay got the ML i would’ve been upset also because its not fair.
Speaking of the EFT, will germany get the same model as britain and italy on launch? Thats what i want to know.
Yes all three have a production T1 for Gaijin to model from which are the same, Italy received PIRATE in T1 but afaik only on a twin seater so I don’t think they’d add that also it might have been on a DA airframe.
I’d expect T1 to be identical for all with 120B and AIM-9Li.
Aw, i wouldnt mind a two seater but oh well. Besides italy has easily the best top tier rn for variety so heres hoping.
nah theyll 100% not give it PIRATE, just to make sure its the worst one, itll also likely come 1 update late, if not more, in true gaijin tradition of screwing german air players
I mean they should just argue that the vehicle can mount it, its a universal thing right? I mean its the same reason the gripen A got improved slightly from being the worst gripen for 3 updates and why the swed gripen C took 3 weeks to be on par with the rest of the gripens after they were all given AGM 65G. I dont see any reason they shouldnt add PIRATE to the german EFT.
I mean, they could, and itd be less work if they did just include it, which is usually in gaijins wheelhouse, but if theres one thing gaijin always goes the extra mile in doing, its screwing germany just cuz they think its funny
This plane would solve all the problems. Only 98-07 could have done it. And be single at the same time, not double.
just apparently no cannon sadly
I am sorry if it is a dumb question, but where did you get that information from?
Imagine yeeting a Taurus from the airfield. It would be hilarious.
its a testing eurofighter, to make place for testing /measurement devices the gun was removed.
From the last picture you would actualy see the cannon but its completly covered, it doesnt even have a temporary cover, its just completly covered
here you see the opening for the gun well
thats the amk kit yes
It was located in the place of the cannon. But I don’t think it’s a problem to draw a cannon to it. Remembering the Yak-141 or F-16AJ
I don’t think two seaters get guns, I dunno in the interest of preserving the peace for as long as possible its best that they are all the same
You misunderstand, this is the first production Eurofighter to be fitted with PIRATE and its Italian, this has nothing to do with Germany.
I was just saying that the caveat to my statement is that the Italians did receive a T1 Blk 5 twin seater EFT with PIRATE (though it might have been a DA airframe I don’t remember).
.
.
.
I can’t be bothered to comment on the IPA7 debate gaijin will do what gaijin do, and I wouldn’t want to be the person deciding.
Twin seaters normally are missing the gun, as for their place in game thats debatable. Rarely does a twin seater have a feature thats a positive over its single seater counterpart. Id like to see as twin seater for many jets as its more of a looks thing imo but as for performance they are always worse than the single and thus dont offer much outside of that.
thanks
