What a shame that they’re to lazy to model it.
They could at least write it at any corner on the MHDD screen at least.
What I also don’t like is that the Map Page doesn’t show me the direction which the A/C goes, but only a dot. They could make it an triangle instead of that useless dot so we can orientate us like in real life, see posted here.
Regarding this bug report, @Gunjob posted this:
Which compares all 3 radars and critically does not state that the ECRS Mk.1 has a smaller FoR than the other 2 radars. FoR is shown for all 3 radars as being ±100deg, with ±90deg being the full power FoR. I might try to put in a third try bug report, but I doubt it’ll work. Gaijin just seems to be deadset on kicking German players while they’re down.
That map bit might need to be reported, but yes.
its why the Cockpit has no backlighting, it did on the dev server and they removed it because of the dynamic buttons
Why is there no option for pirate thermal view?
Likely not modelled yet
I was looking for it too
it seems to be still work in progress for all the AESA EFs since it has lower gimbal limits than the normal british and Italian EFs
If you look very closely you will see that they left it’s eye patch on so you can’t see through it.
Unfortunately, I fully expect it to be rejected as they will claim Airbus doesn’t differentiate between ecrs, despite the ecrs mk1 and mk0 being highly related. Gaijin has claimed in the previous article that talked about the ecrs that airbus didn’t refer to the ecrs, and Gaijin wants a claim that explicitly states the MK1 has the same FoR compared to the MK2 and MK0, or at least the mod in charge does, which itslef is a flawed approach due to the nature of the European COMMON radar system likely assuming that any non-mentioned differences are identical, and this contradiction just being a difference in interpretation between 2 marking groups that have interpreted the weaker performance past 90 degrees differently and instead a clear, never mentioned difference in the COMMON radar system.
Why are they so much more willing to give up info than the British MoD its kinda baffling?
They answer a lot quicker, but their answers are often very vague. Why that is I have no idea.
If the Airbus one would be more recent, and not 1 Months of work, than it would hold more weight
The last answer from on the IRIS-T SLM was 8 Pages long, was pretty datailed written (why they cannot answer)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XRf7IQTpKYNM
I made an updated report, but I highly doubt It will pass.
You should also mention that Hensoldt claims "50% higher angular coverage than traditional AESA radars " which is the exact same thing claimed for ECRS Mk0/2:
Maybe instead of comparing 50 percent of 70 degrees it’s comparing 50 percent of 60? And that adds up to 90 which lines up with FOV in that brochure
Yeah but that’s the same claim as the Mk0 and Mk2 which have 100 FoV/FoR
Already taken down, with link to previous argument. It is better to try and get direct confirmation from sources.
Maybe Germany was destined to always suffer
Could just try to get the German EFT the ECRS Mk0 at this point, seeing as that downgrade would just be a straight upgrade in this game with how gaijins decided to do things
That… describes things perfectly…
