Just out of curiosity would you take me seriously after looking at my stats? I am prepared to have my self-esteem shattered lmao
1 Like
I don’t think this is a good argument against ICE’s radar being more reliable as its very one dimensional. EFT may get more kills simply because it can climb higher and fire at faster speeds (so it has more range). ICE will struggle severly and its best chances are at lawn mowing and picking off stragglers. ICE’s radar though, definitely “felt nicer” to use as I didn’t have to strongarm it into actually working.
EFT is limited by its radar (hence why I’ve been sugggesting that Gaijin just copies the code of the current RBE2-AA into the EFT for a quick fix and adjusts the values down the line instead of leaving it as it is and only reworking it a year from now), ICE is limited by its flight performance. The rest I agree, though, his take on what’s the star of the patch cannot be taken seriously, but Rafale is a very strong contender nevertheless.
2 Likes
Ahah I’m not here just to beat folk down with their stats, but if you must know.
You seem to be above average and have some good KD’s in some decently hard work airframes. I’d say based on the aircraft you do best in, high turn rate and 1 circle fights seem to be where you do best.
You do decently okay in SARH jousting aircraft as well, how much of that is from actual jousts and not just getting into a rate fight I don’t know.
8 Likes
You very well could do this professionally XD
4 Likes
whoa you are good. You pretty much read me like a book.
I have a more serious question though, how do radar gun leads work in game? I can’t seem to make much use of it on jets but even for things like SPAA I aim where it tells me and I miss a lot, is this just because I have high ping?
You should always try to aim in first person view using the radar lead and take into account the acceleration of the target, for example if it’s diving shoot at the edge of the circle in the direction the aircraft is heading, if it’s slowing down, or taking a turn you need to take that into account.
I’m honestly impressed with how well you’ve worded that lmao, Do a lot of performance reviews and such at the day job?
don’t worry about doing one for me, I’m fully aware I’m pretty terrible at Air AB lmao
I sure hope you gonna care about SRE someday…
Maybe they will fix ahead this year?
Wallet warrior…
4 Likes
Are the canards of the Eurofighter supposed to go in the opposite direction as the ailerons?
In real life it can work that way but not the same way it does in-game
lmfao ok… GG, would you like a flanker instead?
3 Likes
So they modeled it wrong for the Typhoon and rafale?
The Gripen, Typhoon, and Rafale are all incorrectly modeled due to Gaijin’s inability to make unstable flight models work with the instructor for mouse aim. The solution is to model them as though they are statically stable.
Small update of the Cockpit Situation for my beloved sim players
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/sNRBtIYVNwxT
4 Likes
Moist.
Thats real nice that you are bringing up Player Cards, Being a “Technical Moderater”, that seems to be what noobs do in the Battle Chat.
Player Cards can be deceiving…Ive learned in playing on and off since Beta.
Not in real good taste mate. Very nice treatment of someone, “in the community”
If someone is speaking from experience then their logged experience is relevant. If someone makes a claim and I think there is sufficient evidence to the contrary I’m going to counter claim against it. I’ve done it before when someone claimed an aircraft couldn’t reach bases, I went 20+ games back to back proving it was possible. If you don’t want you views challenged, don’t post them.
Regarding Thodin, they have some very different takes on how the game is and should be played. Typically they as someone who only interacts with ARB in the form of base bombing and thinks their purchase of an aircraft should guarantee them the right to be able to bomb a base. That kind of gameplay and thinking absolute makes their stats and takes on air to air capabilities of an aircraft relevant to the discussion.
Example from my own stats, I’m bad a ground, I know this, I accept this. I mostly play ground to eventually play CAS. My takes on what take is good or bad in ground should be weighed against the fact I’m not very good at it. That’s evidenced by my stats as well.
13 Likes
"Regarding Thodin, they has some very different takes on how the game is and should be played. Typically they as someone who only interacts with ARB in the form of base bombing…"you said.
I can go for that “point of view”. But I will say mate, “Gaijin employees” dont seem to take criticism of any plane in game well, thats very noticible.
But do recognize that people buy or research planes for different reasons. Personally Ive never flown a bomber since Beta, I like Fighters, but I do not have the final word on “how people should play”.
For instance, I use my Kfir Canard just to bomb bases with a Silver Lion bonus, and be able to defend myself afterwards, other that that, I could care less about it.
Regarding player cards, here in last year I have gotten pretty good. As a result, the negative thing about that is if you fly 50 times in one night, and youre on 30 terrible teams (which is becoming more common), if you are one of the last 2 standing and fighting against 8 enemy planes, your chances are not very good. I just left a match 15 minutes ago and I am done for the night, but I was flying my F15C, and in two minutes it me and a teammate against 9 fox 3 wielding planes…you see thats the deception of a player card.
Thank you for participating however, its good to see an employee active in discussions.