We don’t accept such reports currently, so whilst there will always be some low quality reports, they are not in the majority. What you proposed (to start accepting reports that don’t provide any values of any meaning and just use the words “better” or “improved” with no specific detail as to the what, how or by how much) would simply generate a near endless amount of reports that would allow people to try “buffing” or equally “nerfing” aircraft based on no factual detail at all.
Simply because of the fact that some quality reports are attempted now, does not mean its viable to accept 10-20x that amount and is a very strange reasoning to try to justify.
We have a baseline minimum standard that allows for some leeway and allows people to submit two secondary sources as suggestions for modern vehicles already.
We will never use or handle material that is not fully and completely declassified and without any restrictions. Equally is is not allowed to be shared or posted on any of our platforms and anyone found to be doing so will risk their account being banned.
I will take this opportunity to again remind everyone here, please do not, under any circumstances try to post, use or share any sources unless you are 100% certain they are legally declassified and publicly safe for use.
We will never handle or use them and all it does is actively harm any possible future changes being possible by trying to use them. Do not do it. No good will never come from it for you or the vehicle you are trying to post it for.
Then what kind?
declassified one and dev just said marketing lie classified one you guy say it can’t be used.
then what kind of document you guy really want?
i’m really confused by now
