Looks like marketing lies
8 Likes
It would have been coming from a much higher angle. The higher the angle, the less of a difference multipathing makes. It could have also just hit the building bringing the explosion closer to you.
Or just some other shenanigans
4 Likes
Always with western tech. Only facts when its russian.
Yup, to defeat multipathers, shoot a fox3/1 at them head on from like 3-8ish km out at like a 60 degree upwards angle. the missile will multipath top down, which lets them proxy
3 AMRAAMS got launched at you from high alt, Multipathing kicked in at the very last second to avoid direct impacts and you got smacked by a mixture of them proximity detonating on you and smacking into the houses you were overflying. The third missile (which hit after you were killed) came down directly on top of you and was a direct impact.
Until they fix the radar this plane will remain mid. In sim, it’s like your flying blind. I would legit rather have any other radar. It reminds me of the fucking mig29. You cant even guide in your fox 3’s because the instant the opponent shoots a missile it switches targets to the missile. Hud is still broken in vr too. Likely to remain broken.
Hello
As we have already mentioned, the devs are continuing to work through the reports concerning the Eurofighter and the fixes will keep rolling wherever it is possible. Equally several key radar / IRST issues have been raised again in the feedback which impact multiple aircraft and not just Eurofighter.
This report however:
Has nothing to do with EFT or this topic.
I am serious. Considered by who? In what metrics? How much better?
1 Like
Ah, free abrams type of memes. It’s been a while~~
West can’t have anything better than Reds I supposed
So far we have, wait for pesa flankers to arrive… those radars will be better than anything on EF i bet.
Hi, @Smin1080p_WT,
My request is to simply push them higher up the queue, as sometimes crucial issues that might not initially appear as such often end up too far back in the queue. Especially, the first two bugs, as they require a single line to be changed. The exact same bug for ground radars was changed within 3 months, yet airborne radars are still stuck with it for almost 8, despite them having identical fixes, and the bug being a much bigger problem for them too.
Can it at least be changed to a bug instead of a suggestion. An underperformance of of 2 - 10 times in range does not deserve being called a suggestion.
Likewise, can this bug in the very least be accepted? Or would you prefer the players buy a magnifying glass to use the IRST on their new and shiny Typhoons and Rafales?
1 Like
Something being a suggestion or bug has no bearing on its importance. Both are treated equally in that regard. Its simply how reports that concern a source based point of view that can conflict with other sources (historical reports etc) are classified. So it currently has the correct classification.
I’m calling it
Clearly, suggestions and reports are treated differently.
Also, why is the first Su-27 IRST report just forwarded, but the second one is now a suggestion, despite both of them being based on sources?
First:
Second:
It couldn’t possibly be that the second report was forwarded as a suggestion, because the developer is expected to have the same answer to it as the first one, could it? (first report didn’t really fix much)
The only few other times I had a bug report labeled as a suggestion was for reports that used historical information for features that might seem like they are currently not present in the game.
If you want to see examples of historical reports that were not labeled as suggestions, you are welcome to check my bug reporting profile, there are plenty of them.
Lastly, it seems awfully convenient that the word suggestion is used for both historical inaccuracies and for suggestions for future additions. Why not use clear language here?
1 Like
Not the case. Suggestion vs Bug is a simple classification of how the issues are tagged internally.
Bug: Unintended Issue with the game (Technical, Gameplay, graphics etc)
Suggestion: Suggested change based off information, sources or suggesting missing munitions etc
Something being passed as a suggestion or bug has no bearing on its importance. Things are further internally tagged to distinguish between what may be a historical error for example vs simple missing ordinance. Things can change classification if a developer confirms it should one way or another.
There is no need. The report is labelled correctly as it is. This is simply a misunderstanding of how reports are passed and handled as people commonly misunderstand that a suggestion is not treated “less than” a bug.
If you have further issues or discussion on this matter, then this should be taken to PM.
I will once again remind you for the second time, this is a Eurofighter topic, not an Su-27 or Pantsir topic and this has no relevance to this topic anymore. Your initial questions were answered already.
But, man, come on, ofcourse people will get confused. We have technical mods who deal with bugs and historical inaccuracies alongside suggestion mods who deal with new suggested features and additions, yet historical inaccuracies are said to be forwarded as suggestions? This is not even mentioning monthly suggestions passed to developers. It is only natural that a report of the OLS-27 having less than half of its detection range and a request to add the XF-15C both being called a suggestion raises eyebrows.
You yourself know how many times people ask why their report is a suggestion. Why not just use clear language?
For something that is clearly broken and does not work as intended, call it a bug.
For something that is a historical innacuracie with a fix within the intended scope of the game, like wrong IRST detection range, call it a historical inaccuracy or a historical bug.
For something that is a historical inaccuracy (outside the scope of the game) or a request for a new feature, like tracking radars not being able to double as a limitted seach radar, call it a historical suggestion or a suggested feature.
Have you seen the current state of top tier air? Western countries are vastly better than what Russia has.
How could that possible not be the case?
Suggestions on the Community Bug Report site are entirely unrelated to suggestions here on the forum. They are two entirely different processes, teams and systems.
We do not have a need for multiple different classifications for reports that serve no purpose. We simply have 2 which are purely to define the above distinguishing criteria
I will now for a final time ask that this be taken to PM if there is something you still do not understand or wish to discuss further. This will be the 3rd time of asking for the topic to remain on track.
Your questions have been answered, if you have further ones, they should be taken to the correct place rather than continue to detail this topic further. The next step will be action taken after 3 previous ignored warnings.
Why I’m seeing a buff implying bug discussion about the SPAA that should suffer in my german plane thread?
well… you sure ? because this looks entirely random in this case.
it got closed because a forum suggestion already exists
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Dj1BHjmnDynQ