Eurofighter Typhoon - Germany's Best Fighter Jet (Part 1)

The F-106 supercruised up to 1.5 mach in 1959 - 1960 what does that have to do with the concorde? It had an efficiency of 43% which was best in class at the time but laughable by the standards set by the EJ200. The channel losses are in full effect there as well. You can’t escape physics. 100% bench vs installed thrust is not feasible because no matter what you do, there will be inlet loss coefficient and nozzle loss coefficient. It is not possible unless you have designed some materials that have zero friction.

I’d love to discuss this but it will derail the topic, which is the performance of the EJ200. @kensai16 and @Crazed_Otter are welcome to submit bug reports asking for 90kN thrust, they will be met with the same answer by the devs. Not that they are experts more than we are.

1 Like

I never said there were no channel losses so i won’t file a bug report about it. The thing I’m mostly interested in would be the thrust curve used in game for the engines at different heights, AoAs and speeds but I doubt that we will ever see these graphs.
Additionally the part about the EJ200 being throttled (for reduced wear and doubled service life of all parts) and not running at its full potential power it was designed for currently is of interest to me.

Edit: And another thing would be the pyrophoric flares of the BOL launchers of the EF.

Do not fret. I have personally reached out to the Bundeswehr to gather the necessary information.
Now we wait.
Hopefully our NATO alliance will be enough for them to share to a US citizen.

2 Likes

Hopefully, i put all i can find in that bug report

1 Like

Sorry, You might want gajin convert to CAPTOR-E AESA radar like RBE2-AA AESA radar from french Rafale ?

1 Like

@Fireball_2020 and @Flame2512 supposedly have hard data on channel losses, which is what is used to model the thrust in-game. They also likely have the data you are asking for.

CAPTOR-E still isn’t fitted to German Typhoons yet, although Gaijin might consider a newer Typhoon variant to add to Germany in the future.

Currently, only Kuwaiti and Qatari Typhoons have CAPTOR-E, and they are only the Mk0 version. German Typhoons will get Mk1

At the same time, CAPTOR-E will be much more capable than RBE2-AA and I think asking for it right now is too early.

4 Likes

But why? AFAIK the Eurofighters with the CAPTOR-E only entered production last year. All until todays EFs use the CAPTOR-M (which is still one of the if not the best mechanical radar with AESA-like abilities).

or skip it to make less work for German F-35 (Germany’s best fighter jet).

True.
Pretty much every nation that isn’t US, Russia, and China will have F-35s lol.

No, no Eurofighter from T1 to T3 (accept the Kuwait T3 ones) have Captor-E, this bug report is purley about the name and nothing else

You can calculate it yourself approximately.P=G*(Cc-V)
P=thrust
G=mass flow=
image
m=0.0404
q(lambda)=
image
image
С-Speed air
a кр=The speed of sound, taking into account the inhibited flow
K=1.4
Fв-the area at the entrance to the engine
Pв-dynamic pressure
Tв-dynamic temperature
Cc-The rate of gas outflow from the nozzle (It can take about 900m/s)
V-flight speed

2 Likes

They would need data for mass flow and outflow, I don’t know if 900 m/s outflow is accurate specifically for EJ200 either.

Typhoon doesn’t have less TWR.

@_occho
Typhoon has more thrust than Rafale, not less. Mat lied.
In-game:
Typhoon: 225kn
Rafale: 203kn.

3 Likes

It’s like an approximate figure
image

Rг=Universal gas constant 287
Тг-the temperature of the gas in the mixing chamber (or the temperature in the afterburner)
Кг-1.33
фс=relative pressure losses of the gas in the nozzle
image
Pressure drop at the nozzle section
image

1 Like

Mattawg moment.
This is only why I trust a few War Thunder content creators.

2 Likes

well my attempt at new ammo belts
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/txBiNQqsuVX7

I confirm that you are right)))

https://eurofighter.airpower.at/technik-triebwerke.htm

The normal performance of the engine can be increased by a so-called “war setting”, which, however, leads to a greatly increased maintenance effort and a shorter service life of the engine.
Presumably, this additional power is achieved by increasing the temperature and pressure in the combustion chamber. In this way, an increase in the dry thrust by 15% to 69 kN per engine and an increase in the afterburner thrust by 5% to 95 kN per engine is achieved.
For a few seconds even up to 102kN thrust can be realized without damaging the engine.

So you can even give 102 kH in the game (10401 Kgs) “As the maximum possible power)))”

https://eurofighter.airpower.at/technik-triebwerke-daten.htm

11 Likes

That’s what I’m talking about. A report is open for that but didn’t see any attention until now…
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/xY5nY2hMWExk

4 Likes

image

1 Like