You have no proofs that mraams can be mounted on ther pylons than outer
Don’t forget about such a thing as: “tHeRe ArE nO tEcHnIcaL ReStRiCtIoNs oN iTs UsE”
(☞ﾟヮﾟ)☞
It is not amraams
Oh oops
I’m saying it would have to be the 2nd to the outer wing pylon because that’s the only pylon with double rails. Logical?
Do I have proof no, but where else would it go
1 Like
I thought that 2nd means second from itpsl to inner(centre).
I’m curious what Gaijin’s source is for the double amraam pylon if it’s implemented
I doubt it will, just will be in files like triple agm-65g, ECCM pods and etc.
I think someone on discord suggested the datamine implies its connected to the TMC Snap points, which I believe should theoretically support AMRAAM no?
1 Like
This is why they hid their names, so they say stupid things like that without being held accountable. .
3 Likes
Like a certain one while dealing with the mess of the Baz Meshupar, completely ignored all evidence while misusing and fabricating his own
Although in this case I think some numbers where miscommunicated to the devs so nothing with ill intentions on their end
Oh, no… Another admin replaced “accepted” with “not a bug”
1 Like
I think I’m going a little crazy :（
Dev updated again I think
Whats your version?
Is it 2.42.0.23?
yes
Then its allready old…
well I suppose that makes up for no AIM120 on the inner pylons, it weird they denied that but are adding the double rack.
They might be, there is a lot in the files that never sees the light of day
2 Likes