Anyhow, @Smin1080p_WT
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Ti8sRnk7t7cu
Could you forward this report, it’s a quick and very easy fix to Germany retaining Brimstones since T3A B25 jets are post P3E, meaning they are Brimstone compatible.
Don’t know. I am not a dev. I have no personal issue with 9LI but I dont play sim
clearly, if you do that you will remove all the fantasy mavericks from swedish gripen that the community bullied you to make up right?
This being the weaker engineer prototype I assume it’s the tornado engines wouldn’t this indicate it also being heavier for the prototype to therefore the EJ200 engine euro is actually underperforming more?
The requirement was 20 deg/s, and it should be higher than the protoype (whatever that performance was, since it had weaker engines), yes.
There is also the consideration of at what speed it should reach these sustained turn rates.
Wait, so… I am a bit of an internet explorer and late to the party, but what the hell:
Where are their sources for Italy using AIM-9Ms? Their primary IR missile pre IRIS-T was AIM-9L/I-1 from Germany. He didn’t even “accuse” anyone of anything, just gave examples of aircraft which have been given more leeway, but the same can’t be given to Germany?
Lmao.
they sorcered the Aim 9M from their AV 8B+ stock back into existence
Yep, Rafale is also underperforming in the same regime but to a lesser extent
Dude they are claiming that manufacturers are liars when it comes to supercruise ability, they also denied bunch of Rafale bug reports.
What do you expect from them? lul.
“Reliable developers and reliable tech mods”.
As if Gaijin can admit that Western is superior in terms of almost everything.
At this point im just laughing to their most claims.
also locks comments
that is, daftly, standard on bug reports.
I say it’s daft because someone else may have documents they wish to add/present, but aren’t the original reporter and aren’t in contact with reporter.
They should 100% go back to showing who handles bug reports.
As well as making their edits SHOW an icon saying it was edited.
Hi everyone!
I would like to apologize for the wording in report answer about supercruise capability and confusion caused. I meant that it looks like the speed mentioned in the websites is unlikely to be physically achieved under normal circumstances in real combat flight. Once again sorry for the words chosen and the misunderstanding.
Wait the Devs actually look on the forums?
So it should be achievable in-game with a clean airframe and say >50% fuel?
