Its an opinion.
Pros to the HMD, can slew and lock things off boresight.
Cons at close ranges you want TWS or ACM mode and the HMD doesnt allow those modes.
I only have top tier experience in the Gripen.
There are far too many potential threats you dont see in HMD PD mode
And I can count on one hand when the HMD has been useful.
Is the Typhoon going to be a brick?
I didnt say HMD was useless I said you cannot leverage it like the Su-27s can as we lack a high off boresite capability.
The brick was reference to the tornado gr4. You do realise you can use just standard HMS without having use to use to to slew the radar and just slew IR missiles and use TWS or ACM as normal. Also the 9M is capable of high off bore sight 😂 just because it don’t have TVC doesn’t mean it’s not HOB it’s got a very large look angle before launch
40° on the AIM-9M is not considered “high” off-boresight. Quick google search places the general limit for what is considered “HOBS” at “greater than 40°” tho Id suspect it would theoretically be more than that, since most, if not all missiles considered to be “HOBS capable” have a pre-launch gimble limit of 60° (R-73, MICA IR) or more (IRIS-T is up to 90°).
Well ideally we get an AIM-120 & AIM-9 Typhoon a solid few updates before next-gen IR missiles with newer versions of jets are added.
That or long-before they’re added to existing jets.
I want to spade these things using the more antiquated historical loadouts before said power creep.
i turn my radar off when i try to get close. in that state, you can select HMD ACM by pressing the “lock” button or go to regular BST ACM by pressing the ACM button
These waveforms are all available in all search or track modes.
In ACM the default and only predefined waveform is MPRF (pre-track) this is the same for HMD. Once you have gone from either ACM or HMD the PRF will be automatically managed, typically unless the target goes realllllly far away MPRF is going to be the only waveform used.
The only advantage ACM has over HMD is it is constantly trying to acquire a target, depending on the situation ahead of you this can be good or bad, an example would be it tracks the second it sees the target in the ACM box (good) or there being lots of targets that aren’t your intended target which end up getting tracked (bad).
HMD is less random in its tracking as typically the acquisition area is small and you decide what to track. This lowers the workload in cluttered environments and allows you to select targets off your centreline.
Anything that lowers pilot workload is a boon and you should take advantage of it.
This also reads across to any potential Typhoon we might see in the future.
while HMD is less random, i find ACM to be far more reliable. i dont know what it is but the acquisition time or something is just too short and it often misses targets that are coming right at you and are like 10km away. its a big problem imo