Eurofighter thrust wrong?

Also, where is the fuel tank Loadout?

As far as I can tell from a quick test

F-16 no changes
F-15 no changes
Mig-29 no changes
J11/Flankers - no changes
Gripen - no changes
J-10 - no changes
Mirage2k - no changes

I assume that they didn’t change anything else

they also didn’t even give the su-33 a proper flight model either, its so pathetic

How so? From the new planes the su-33 is the only one that might be accurateish lol

1 Like

it handles just like the su-27 except heavier and maybe a more instantaneous turn rate at higher speed, but they still lack their proper aoa and they bleed too much speed

Idk what you were expecting… The su-33 is basically an heavier su-27. It has over 90º aoa already

1 Like

I was expecting a non-nerfed flight model, all flankers have a nerfed flight model and they didn’t change that with the su-33 its fucking pathetic

Ok… But that’s how they handle more or less I think. You can already squeeze ±20deg/s of sustained turn rate and have incredibly low speed handling with full controls, you have strong acceleration even with heavy load-outs and very high top speeds for a plane that size.

That plane will allow you to pull excessive aoa in mouse aim which results in a lot of speed bleed if you aren’t careful.

Are you expecting a flanker to have better energy retention than an F-15 which can’t pull nearly the same aoa?

Btw, here’s the current engine values.

(values per engine, 1/2 total thrust)

Static max thrust: 8644kgf
Static dry thrust: 5900kgf

Mach1 max thrust: 14035kgf
Mach1 dry thrust: 6178kgf

Mach1.3 (wing rip) max thrust: 13387kgf

This is correct. The Typhoon can supercruise the F-16 cannot.

Sure, but leaving it at 13.7 isn’t

We’ll have to see if they do a little decompress. like they did last year when the F-16C and Gripen. 14.0 would likely be more appropriate for it. Though the F-15Es and probably also the F-15Cs will join it at 14.0.

ngl they are probably going to add 14.0 and put it there with f15e raflele etc

beat me too it lol

1 Like

I sure hope the EF and the rafale (if fixed) go 0.3 above anything else there is currently in top tier. 14.0 max BR is still too low.

Imagine the french F-16A (only IR missiles, old radar, 60 countermeasures (more if you ditch some missiles) seeing eurofighters most of the time

RAFLELE the terror of the skies lmao

1 Like

Seems like they have extremely low channel loss compared to other aircraft.

If my math is correct with the information I have.

The current iteration of EF has an channel loss of 4.7%

From what I have seen it’s also to slow compared to real life it should go up to Mach 2.35 according to the Bundeswehr

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/j5yHCfIPWJ7j

1 Like

Because its an Eurofighter and not an F16? Why do you not accept this thing? We dont need nerf to unrealistic flight model.

Bro. I said “Things I noticed in the current EF FM”. Not that I want to nerf it or buff it. I have no opinion on the Eurofighter FM because I have no clue about how it really behaves irl.

It was just an observation to put things into perspective.

The only thing I don’t accept about the EF is its BR. Should be 14.7 and then we could decompress stuff 12.7 and up.

1 Like