I was about to link all the silly vehicles I enjoy and how many games I have in each of them. 😂
1 Like
No genuinely. What did you expect from It.
Was the Imp chaparal going to be one of them? Because that would be based.
With your schizo posting I’m never sure.
Genuinely tho how did you expect embt to be good big ass turret ring ass turret ass ammo but a good hull 🤷♀️ how did you think it would be meta or close
No joke. I have multiple ground kills in the Israeli Imp. chaparral.
1 Like
Giving it a better round would have made it something other than the worst vehicle in the French 12.0+ lineup.
Even more based.
2 Likes
2a5 and 2a6 are both worse for the most part
The 2A6 is arguably better than the EMBT. And both 2A5 and 2A6 at least still serve a purpose in the French tree as hull down snipers. The EMBT being worse than the Leclerc in every meaningful way and worse than the 2A5/2A6 in their respective roles in the French lineup makes the EMBT the worst vehicle in the french 12.0+ lineup.
The strawmanning in this thread is getting tiring.
No one is asking for the EMBT to be meta defining (which is impossible anyway given they massive turret ring weakspot anyway), all we’re asking is for gaijin to give it something to compensate for the massive weakspot and make it just… not DOA.
And all gaijin has to do is give it SHARD or at least DM53. That way:
- France gets an MBT with similar RoF but with better rounds
- Germany gets an MBT with similar rounds but better RoF
And just like that, it has a niche that makes it unique to both trees.
And if you’re worried about balance, the Type 10/TKX would still be better in pretty much every way and gaijin doesn’t seem to find them overpowered, so the EMBT sure as hell won’t be either.
4 Likes
I was somehow expecting something meta with APS, after US, GB, RU got tanks with APS over the last two patches.
3 Likes
Nice
LOL
Bring back Coelian, then
2 Likes
Hull armour is the main issue lmao look how much worse it is then 122. Where it should be identical.
“should be” better no identical strv have 20 years old chassie… + this no have dm53 bud gaijin added dm53 for strv irl no operate with this ammo … but for germany add french ammo why the hec… dm53 and other ammos is standart nato ammo?
Means nothing to the game.
and this is the main problem germany export older version to allies and this nations upgrade it with some armor but chassie with hull armor remain same… and somehow gaijin every update add better “2a7v” equivalent leopards for other nations no understand german leopard why have 4-5 tons more weight if no have better protection vs others…
so embt with 62 ton have 62 km/h max speed but leopard2 hel 63 ton 68 lm/h max speed?? how?
EMBT uses Leopard 2A7/8 chassis. Its uparmored with best existing armor for Leopard models. It comes along with more weight, ofc. To extend the service life of suspension, transmission etc, the engine/gearbox have been changed. Top speed has been governed to 62 km/h.
For Leopard 2A4 early models it was 72 km/h top speed. This was later governed to 68 km/h for A4 late to A6 models. Todays latest iteration as I stated…62. So over the decades, Leopard 2 traded speed for protection.
Leopard 2A6 HEL is governed to 68km/h. But has less sophisticated armor arrays. Like from decades ago.
2a7+. What wasn’t limited to 62 kph
So does the embt/2a7+ exact same armour both use MEXAS