It’s possible just very unlikely
Yup we need at least one of them
My biggest disappointment is that it was introduced as the main ground addition, instead of:
2A7A1 + EMBT
Leclerc + EMBT
5 Likes
Gajin always adds superior protection values to non-German Leopards. Thats tradition. You’ll find the best German made tanks in foreign tech trees. Since years.
4 Likes
My two cents.
- 5 sec reload.
- no hump
- I can bring more than 16 shells
Leos 6.4, hump and limited first ammo rack in exchange for extra survivability screw me up frequently in battles. And I couldn’t care about armor any less with mindset of "you are not supposed to get hit.
2 Likes
This is an absolutely 100% valid valid argument for Germany, but it’s pretty much a useless tank for France. They literally get nothing worthwhile from playing the EMBT, just an even worse Leclerc.
I already have 4 Leclercs available to me in top tier France, which are all better than the EMBT, so in what world would I ever even consider bringing the thing in my high tier lineup?
3 Likes
People don’t understand that the small benefit of the hull armor is completely negated by the huge turret ring (and turret for that matter) weak spot
4 Likes
Not to mention that the EMBT is considerably less mobile and taller than any Leclerc. 2 of the view good/great things left about the Leclerc is it’s mobility and smaller size.
4 Likes
you know, the more i think about all the top tier tanks i’ve played and spaded, the more i notice how many of them require extra % of player skill to compensate with the drawbacks
sometimes i’d just like a good tank all around and not always back to back masochist struggle…
yet we really cannot beat the dev’s induced frustration cycle…
that being said, i’m looking forward for Leo 2a6HEL a lot more
2 Likes
Just because YOU don’t care doesn’t mean others don’t.
Because here’s a crazy thought: They could make it "cool"and somewhat viable at the same time.
Give it DM53 or SHARD and it might have a bit of a niche.
Currently no matter how “cool” it might be, it’s DOA due to gaijin’s decisions. We have every right to call them out to try to improve the situation.
Wow them not giving something completely unrealistic for it to use. How awful.
They could add a butchered version but that would likely not happen since the lack of information
Gaijin sometimes gives rounds to vehicles even though they have very little info if said tank and said nations actually could or did use said round.
Imagine being such a shill and still making incorrect assumptions about Gaijin.
Unfortunately correct and in most cases it should be reverted lmao
Ah yes, the very unrealistic solution of…
check notes
Giving it a STANAG 4385 compliant round (made by one of the two nations involved in the design of this vehicle) to be fired from a STANAG 4385 compliant gun.
So unrealistic 🙄
We know its material, its muzzle velocity and the total weight and length of the shell. We also have a very clear picture from the manufacturer itself of the penetrator that would allow us to estimate its length.
That’s enough data to estimate its penetration values, which isn’t any different from anything else at top tier since everything is classified.
We don’t.
Oh my god I can’t believe it, actually found a source from something @Leo2A6EX-live claims none exist with a simple google search. Unbelievable
That’s most likely the entire round not just penetrator. And then if it was penetrator its a great reason not to add it lmao.
More like it’s a broad statement that could mean a few things and in this case is likely the entire round including cartridge. Not just penetrator.
If it’s the penetrator tho it would equal very good performance in game equalling much more modern rounds then we currently have
If you actually read messages in their entirety you’d known which one it is.