and what of the Balance issues already present in naval? it needs expanded up to like 9.3 atleast.
Things like Warspite, Hood, and Vanguard, the Standard types, and MORE, should not be facing off against THIS, and the Satsuma and Montana that all 3 have leaked in the past couple months.
We already know they are coming, SO is naval really not going to get any balancing at all? Are we just gonna be stuck with Paper super battleships going up against Upgraded WW1 era Designs and stop gap battleships?
EDIT: Genuinely never thought id be defending the Soyuz, But REALLY? Atleast it was a solid real, properly engineered and designed vessel despite how impossible its construction was, the H39 was a pipe dream, that never had barrettes, loading systems, propulsion plant, or even most of its internal structures properly designed. Its more akin to adding the damn L3 or N3 battleships, its the same level of fakery. Actually i can’t even say that, the N3 atleast was a complete design.
This isn’t a 2A7A1; it has the frontal armor of the 2A7V. And the 2A7V didn’t receive an APS kit—at least, not as far as I’m aware. So, it could be the 2A8, and if it is, then Sweden would get it too. Do you agree?
sounds right. Besides, the centerpoint for the EX isnt even that, its mostly the monster of a powerplant and the AESA and EPAWS, which hopefully get implemented. i would also add on the fly by wire compatiblity, but gaijin likely wouldnt model that in any meaningful way.
If it’s a sign of a little more focus on adding vehicles that generally share hulls/turrets more often we could see a number of juicy AML, ERC, Fox, AMX-13, BMP, and Patria’s added
