Dunkerque discussion

Three ships…

Back when it was discussed, Dunkerque was the only one around. Perhaps they’ll be more willing to reconsider with three.

1 Like

I have my doubts. Probably would be too much hassle implementing that into the engine. We probably see a 3 axis stabilised Turms III before that…

1 Like

Exactly. We can’t have a historical ammunition layout without the implementation of historical “half turrets” where each one has its dedicated shell room for supply.

Although, I would argue that current subdivision of ammunition is one step closer to this. We can’t have “half turrets” without subdivided ammo rooms. The solution to implement is to have the upper ammo room linked to the right pair of guns and the lower ammo room linked to the left. Like you, I have my doubts on whether Gaijin will implement this at all, even for three ships.

4 Likes

Done !

I think it’s indeed better to not mix the discussion regarding the different ships, especially since they are so similar but so different at the same time, it could be confusing ^^’

6 Likes

Thank you my good sir . Now i can complain for hour about the nerf velocity of the richelieu shell

1 Like

Look how low the dunkerque class is supposed to sit in the water compared to what we got ingame…

How deep does she sit in games as I got told that ships can sit higher in the water than in live games

This is a photo of Strasbourg right after its scuttling in Toulon in 1942. It’s not just low on water : It’s resting at the bottom of the port because it was sabotaged.

7 Likes

Press and hold J for 3 sec and you will have this waterline

3 Likes