Also i’m not even sure if that can be considered “110 RPM 3 round burst” tbh. The breaks inbetween the 3-round shorts are long enough that by timing the video, I got around 62RPM which is in line with this:
Also this:
So it’s at best a 100 RPM gun at its absolute fastest meaning my original point STILL STANDS:
“me when devblog lies”
My guess is 100 RPM is what the gun is actually capable of, but it’s limited to 60 RPM while installed in the Badger
Ah, the Puma syndrome.
It would be nice if they added the Olifant Mk1B, which is the main version used in South Africa.
so. a Patria (Finnish company) veichle that eventualy is gonna go to South Afrika, gets added to Britain before Sweden? its the JAS 39C story all over again. why gaijin?
depending on the amount of pen this must eighter go at 9.7 or 9.3 but please not lower
Sweden really doesn’t need another Autocannon tank at Rank VI lol
honestly. forgot that thing existed.
Britain
Can we have a 40mm IFV like the Ajax, Boxer or Warrior Verdi II for top/higher tier?
Gaijin
Sure, take this 30mm Badger for 9.X
GJ logic: both icv and mcv are 9.7 and better, therefore badger should be 10.0.
This is a joke(kind of) I’m hoping for 9.3 if it’s not going to have irst/spall liners
its a vehicle plattform like the boxer chassis, which the vilkas and the boxer mgs are versions of,
prob 9.7 like VBCI-2, RCV (p) & ICV (p)
i have no knowledge of a boxer variant with a 40mm
Now thats cool
Is the variant we are getting the Badger Section Variant or Badger Fire Support Variant? Both look the same externally but the FSV carries extra ammo and a 2 man anti-tank team in place of passengers.
i personally do not see a good reasoning why to choose an abandoned turret test rig, over the latest warrior iterations or ajax
They would be, but it’s still an additional option as Britain is making Boxers (about 100+ been made so far) and I’m not sure if they have abandoned the turret or not . But tested is more than enough for Gaijin
But either are better than a 9.7 given we have no 9.7 lineup so you’ll be uptiering this to 10.3
I see the higher usecase and the lineup thing
i would say final agreement, it would have a reason to exist and from there we are at gaijins mercy,
also i want to mention that gaijin has no problem putting 30 mm and 25 mm autocanons at 10.0+ br(freccia, namer, puma, cv90 mk4) and i know some of those are heavily armored
