[Development] Badger IFV: A Beast Yet To Come

You see we have 2 different brochures, right?

1 Like

Also i’m not even sure if that can be considered “110 RPM 3 round burst” tbh. The breaks inbetween the 3-round shorts are long enough that by timing the video, I got around 62RPM which is in line with this:

image

Also this:

So it’s at best a 100 RPM gun at its absolute fastest meaning my original point STILL STANDS:
“me when devblog lies”

1 Like

My guess is 100 RPM is what the gun is actually capable of, but it’s limited to 60 RPM while installed in the Badger

1 Like

Ah, the Puma syndrome.

5 Likes

It would be nice if they added the Olifant Mk1B, which is the main version used in South Africa.

1 Like

so. a Patria (Finnish company) veichle that eventualy is gonna go to South Afrika, gets added to Britain before Sweden? its the JAS 39C story all over again. why gaijin?

1 Like

depending on the amount of pen this must eighter go at 9.7 or 9.3 but please not lower

Sweden really doesn’t need another Autocannon tank at Rank VI lol

Isn’t this a Patria?

5 Likes

honestly. forgot that thing existed.

Britain

Can we have a 40mm IFV like the Ajax, Boxer or Warrior Verdi II for top/higher tier?

Gaijin

Sure, take this 30mm Badger for 9.X

15 Likes

GJ logic: both icv and mcv are 9.7 and better, therefore badger should be 10.0.

This is a joke(kind of) I’m hoping for 9.3 if it’s not going to have irst/spall liners

its a vehicle plattform like the boxer chassis, which the vilkas and the boxer mgs are versions of,

prob 9.7 like VBCI-2, RCV (p) & ICV (p)

i have no knowledge of a boxer variant with a 40mm

1 Like

Now thats cool

Is the variant we are getting the Badger Section Variant or Badger Fire Support Variant? Both look the same externally but the FSV carries extra ammo and a 2 man anti-tank team in place of passengers.

1 Like

i personally do not see a good reasoning why to choose an abandoned turret test rig, over the latest warrior iterations or ajax