Verdi 2 and warrior CSP are the only 2 that should be added.
2 Likes
None of these are in service with the UK’s Army, or SA’s for that matter.
RCT-30 is also a Germany exclusive (only ordered by them), Sampson is a Lithuania exclusive. None of them have been tested by the UK either, as UK considers the 30mm to be too weak and instead opted for a casetelescoped 40mm design.
1 Like
Which is a lovely gun the rotating breach and loading system is very impressive
But they were considered at some point, which is more than the addition of certain vehicles to trees as is. The video source is a UK government source, so its not like some random video from someone on the net.
yeah quick check, it has been considered by the British, but they have an express favoritism towards the sampson system
1 Like
it is sad that we only get another spud gun for britain whilst other nations are getting their atgm carrying ifvs. this vehicle should either have the missile attachment or they should have added that one patria amv with the 40mm and 2+ javelins. there is a decent amount of ifvs to add to britain like the ajax with 1 javelin, the boxer with the 40mm and 2+javelins, the dardo hull and british turret prototype (idk what it is called) do better gaijin
3 Likes
Yep like France Gaijin wont add the CTAS 40mm…Instead we get this and it’s missing spall liners and variable rate of fire…But sure thanks for nothing
So judgiing by dev it is basically vbci mct30 without thermals but with 4 crew at 9.0. Meanwhile cv9030fin without tracking, lws, speed sits at 9.3 and gets thrown to 10.3. And vbci mct30 sits at 9.7. Gaijin is decent at balancing as usual
Wait ot has no IRST and no Thermals…
What a pointless addition
It does have tracking on dev server currently
1 Like
Mad that it has tracking but no thermals that must be an oversight?
Thermals dont really matter for me. Im mad that cv9030 is worse in every aspect than this and sits at 9.3. Same about 9.7 vbci, it sits there for no reason
CV90 is tougher and thermals absolutely do matter.
I wouls trade 0.3 BR increase for commander and gunner thermals
Cv90 is not tougher than badger because badger got 4 crewmates dispersed in turret and hull while cv9030 has 3 crewmates placed close to each other which means badger has higher chance to survive apfsds from mbt. In hulldown combat it also lives longer thx to 2 crewmates hidden in hull.
Also I looked again at dev stream and saw thermals in modules (didnt notice thermals during one of dev streams). It makes cv9030 and vbci even more worthless at their br.
CV90 will have an armoured hull more armoured and a stronger turret
I haven’t seen the ammo belts they both have access to. I think the badger has fewer rounds and needs to be reloaded unlike the CV90 which has a continual belt?
But yeah maybe the CV-90 needs to come down too
Oh dear 40 rounds per clip for Badger yeah that sucks
That “more armoured” could only work against 12.7 hmg tho cv9030fin gets shredded from sides by nsvt.
They have same 30mm apfsds but fin has bigger belt size. Thats the only difference rn which is not worth being at 9.3 and being worse at anything else.
Cv90s should move to lower br and devs should balance stuff based on its ingame performance and not on just “IT HAS WHOPPING 30MM APFSDS AND GEN 3 THERMALS WOW”
30mm is average right?
i guess since we now have the patria hull we could be one step closer to the patria amv 40mm and the javelins
same turret but on the boxer hull
3 Likes
there is a version with that same turret and with the badgers hull