Milimeter wave guidance
No, we all know gaijin will just hit those bug reports with not enough info.
So kinda like the modern Nato spaa missiles that should be able to track hovering helis as long as their engine is on?
“I don’t want to improve the state of the game so I’m just going to bitch about what isn’t implemented instead of making the case for it”
You folk are tiring, but guess this is what we get for opening the forums to yanks.
1 Like
Or is that micro Doppler?
No people try constantly to do so, but it gets shut down. I didn’t say nobody tried.
Yanks? I didn’t say USA, I said NATO, so everyone from China and Russia. Only one that is spared is Japan
Not really tldr it’s just very high resolution low range ( <5km) active radar homing. The missile has its own MMW radar, short wavelength allow for accurate target discrimination.
Oh ok
Yeah but at this point they are only present in two nations, this is exactly the same as introducing MMW guidance for example only for JAGMs and brimstones.
But they dont for balance, which is why its silly that logic isnt applied to the russians
(im not protesting your statement)
i just did a flyout in my STOCK SU-33 in nuclear thunder and it was easy asf i could get to the frontline without getting locked the whole way i could fly right next to enemy carriers and they barley even tried to kill me i could climb and not immidiatly get spammed by the US AA and get this i could take off without immediately having to go defensive this is in contrast to my spaded F-16C/D/I that the second i leave the airfield i am locked and shot at by BUKs all the way across the map and if i dont go defensive i will die if i get withing 10km of cariers i will evaporate if i go near the frontline i will get evaporated by 2S6s BUKs and if i try and use my AGM-88C the AAs turn their radar off but can still perfectly track and launch at me and if i do it from far away they will shoot me and all my missiles down at the same time gaijin really needs to nerf the russian AA
Ever since the pantsir the russian spaa has been miles ahead of other nations spaa. 100% agree
1 Like
im talking about nuclear thunder although yes russian top tier in the normal game is busted they are atleast bound by some rules like not shooting on the move and having to use there radar the russian AA in nuclear thunder isnt they will spam missiles while moving intercept everything and launch on the airfield i dont think its so much of a technology problem as is is an AI problem they should reduce the range AAs shoot players at but only on the russian side american side is completly useless rn and mabye swap out the BUK with something else so that multipath actually works instead of getting exploded by a missile that hit the ground
But I said that straight away, still, it doesn’t change the fact that the F-14 isn’t terrible in dogfights, though I also said straight after that its greatest strength against the F-15 is positioning
it’s almost worse than the MiG-29 in a df…
I don’t think so, but I’ve had such a bad time with the plane on other occasions that I’ve formed the opinion I have of it
Hi @Smin1080p_WT, i would like to grab your attention in regards to the following report Community Bug Reporting System
The closure of this report under the “not enough info” label overlooks the nature of the provided data. The attached documents are not speculative third-party claims they constitute primary industrial evidence published directly by the original design bureau, JSC NIMI named after V.V. Bahirev, and its parent holding company, Tecmash.
Because these materials are official technical data sheets distributed by the manufacturer at state-sponsored defense expositions (ARMY-2019 and ARMY-2021), they do not possess a traditional multi-page book structure. The single-page documents contain all necessary authentication, explicitly featuring the official corporate branding, manufacturer headers, and contact logistics.
- The documents are authored by the sole state engineer of the projectile, satisfying the highest standard for historical and technical accuracy.
- The English technical placard directly states the 125mm 3VBM23 round with 3BM60 APFSDS projectile is “intended for defeat modern upgraded tanks… including intense reactive armor.”
- The Russian technical sheet confirms identical specifications and explicitly notes its capability against “усиленной динамической защитой” (enhanced dynamic protection / ERA).
Furthermore, given that this munition remains in active modern service, higher-level technical blueprints and diagrams are legally restricted. They cannot be posted here, as doing so would directly violate Gaijin guidelines regarding classified or restricted military documentation. Consequently, these official data sheets distributed directly by the designer represent the highest tier of legally publishable, unclassified primary source evidence available.
As official manufacturer documentation confirms that the 3BM60 was explicitly engineered to counter advanced reactive armor arrays, this round should logically receive the same anti-ERA performance characteristics being implemented for its counterparts.
Best regards.
2 Likes
Are we getting the J-16 anytime soon, or is it still too advanced for the game right now? after this update.