yeah lets just throw logical thinking out of the window because it wouldnt benifit my favourite plane in WT
6 Likes
bingo warning at 8:26, lands at 9:22…
1 Like
that is 2 minutes also known as 56 seconds
2 Likes
Gripen was overperforming, and probably still is much like the rafale
1 Like
Yeah, about a one minute difference like I said earlier, take 3 seconds away.
bais in my statment here but im not seeing that many gripens out in airbattles as of late and i know this is due to the funner aircraft like the f18,rafale and euro fighter though when i do see em there fine i dont think there a lot better as for the rafale its kinda overpreforming but only really within 10km becuase the mica has no range and its not the best bvr aircraft out there
of which he will be idle thrust for atleast 30s of that.
Bingo first appears at 8:04, and the plane then arrives in its final approach where engines are likely idling (and just before he does the Bingo shenanigans) at 9:03.
That’s just about 1 minute. After burner uses about 3x as much fuel as Mil power. So consuming more than 2 minutes of fuel in that timeframe is entirely possible.
It’s not complete rebuttal of the argument, it’s just criticism.
But somehow being critical is alsways good when it’s on your side (such as the discussions around the latest engine power report on the rafale) but is a conspiracy that French mains are definitely gatekeeping parts of sources when it’s against
2 Likes
Critical thinking is always good
2 Likes
Also fuel and bingo fuel warnings arent the same, to the best of my knowledge, thats why it gives a fuel warning, then declares bingo about 20s later.
bingo fuel is the point where you are forced to retun back to base
fuel warning is just a warning about that in advance
1 Like
indeed, so we would take the 800kg mark from the point it says bingo, which was 8:26 ish.
Gentlemen, please calm down.
Hello guys.
Just to clarify, we are aware of some discrepancies and disputes regarding a Rafale report. The developers are currently re-reviewing all material to ensure the correct outcome.
In the meantime. Please keep discussions here civil. There is no need for personal attacks.
34 Likes
I hope Rafale is implemented accurately without any other noise.
3 Likes
Kinda curious how would Gaijin treat Rafale up to the next patch with this first (since the Storm Warning Dev Server) Rafale nerf. Either way, it’s still overperforming both in the player and the FM itself.
3 Likes
VNE I increasing please.
1 Like
Hey, could you please link me the report smin is talking about? Thanks!
They use kmh instead of knots?