Dassault Rafale - Variants, Characteristics, Armament and Performance

Please calm down and take a break.

you all should calm down, your discussions bring absolutely nothing.

3 Likes

as far as i am concerned i am done now, i answered specific questions topics to the best of my ability.
But i am not gonna let myself get attacked for stuff that didnt happen

There’s no point in being inflammatory and bringing up things that have already been reported and we don’t have anything further to add right now @dotSHINI Let’s let the developers go over the reports and handle them, I don’t see a reason for any fighting/instigation to be going on. It would be like me going to the Eurofighter thread and bringing up that “Eurofighter is overperforming in acceleration” EF2000 Overperforming in Acceleration // Gaijin.net // Issues.

7 Likes

if its the case its fair, thats what discussing the threads are for, no matter if its to buff stuff or nerf stuff.
I have no problem with you doing that

2 Likes

Once the devs/tech mods update the reports then maybe it’s worth bringing it up for a discussion but we’re beating a dead horse at this point.

1 Like

I understand where you’re coming from, but I suppose different threads operate in different ways, we normally don’t bring up old issues that have already been reported besides the occasional questions asking if there is any updates.

@DirectSupport well at least if its not dishonest stuff like Mulatu tried to do

1 Like

Well, if your argument is that you’re only just doing what Mulatu used to do, I would like to point out that Mulatu is banned now so…

i mean, everything started cause only 1 guys asked for updates on a matter and then incongru asked me to elaborate

nono, i meaned in the way of misusing sources to falsly try to win arguments.
Generaly misuse of sources etc

Like his topic of AASM IR seekers being better then MWW seekers

Upon further review, I acknowledge that my claims were excessive.

Over the past few months, the thread has been chaotic with meaningless arguments. For this reason, I reacted overly sensitively.

I sincerely apologize.

8 Likes

Keep in mind, those documents might not be exhaustive.
For example that could be just one of the operating modes for the AASM.

As for mmW vs IIR, I think the fact that GBU-53/B uses mmW + IIR (and uncooled IIR at that) is quite telling that both have their advantages in certain scenarios …

Alrighty everybody… It’s totally fine to discuss and to disagree with each other, just make sure to do it in a respectful way. The off-topic and rule-breaking messages will be dealt with.

6 Likes

here you go

I wonder what the future holds for the AASM IR.

If developers decide to keep it, other weapons known to be unable to track moving targets (ex. SCALP-EG/Storm Shadow, JSOW, JASSM…) should also be able to track moving targets in the same way as the AASM IR.

Yeah no ideas.
There we get to ifs territory.
Can only speak about the current released information.
But generaly their own statements is that laser seeker is meaned for moving targets and ir for facilities

Always gotta remember as well the hammer is supposed tp be a relatively cheap upgrade kit

3 Likes

HAMMER seems like a natural evolution to the paveway-series guidance kit really. Which makes sense given that’s what France developed it for as far as I can see.

1 Like

definitly, but that realy to be kept in mind. End of the day its an upgrade kit. And will have less capability then some dedicated armament