Counter-counterargument is that FM performance only matters in late-game scenarios where one team didn’t get stomped, which doesn’t happen a lot. So shouldn’t affect winrate statistics by a lot.
Fair enough, guess we’ll see. I know that in sim though, this will make this thing infinitely more of a nightmare than it already is, already know quite a few ppl that refuse to play top tier sim now because of this plane, and this change isn’t gonna help things. The F1C-200 BR range is also likely to be flooded by even more premium players.
1 Like
Not so much when discussing their ordnance, i.e. magic 2.
8 Likes
Yup, saddly very true. That’s why I specified FM devs. I belive the Ground Tech tree isn’t really blessed either.
Sigh. Let’s not talk about that.
Although I’d say French air is generally blessed above 10.3, while 8.3-9.7 is far from meta. Aside from the 7.7 Ouragan/barougan, not a single MB/mystere airframe is up to par compared to, say a mig15 or other jets at their BR, and while the Alpha Jet is good, but not as good as the German one at the same BR in Air RB (since no flares, despite a slightly better kit overall for CAS I’d say). The etendard is ok, but the BR range is very difficult for flare less jets. The F8U (fn) is pretty abysmal imo as well, and the Mirage IIIC is playable. Starting from the IIIE things get dramatically better (although I haven’t played it in a long while).
I also don’t mention the BENELUX line since I basically have not played it at all aside from a bit of the F16A (which I don’t like, being at 13.0 against 14.0 most of the time)
7 Likes
I put a graph up earlier, with the change it gets very close to the eurofighter but its still slightly worse in every metric. However now it should handily beat the gripen.
1 Like
No worries, the arguments had been getting too long anyway, was good where it ended.
5 Likes
Rafale’s IRST should gimbal and scan 140 degrees in 3-4 seconds. // Gaijin.net // Issues
Rafale’s display should show yellow line in IRST lock. // Gaijin.net // Issues
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/17F1WLmcYbvV
Incorrect rear gear movement for Rafale
8 Likes
Not accurate, for example the Rafale can’t launch Brimstones
Forwarded.
IRST Scan Rate needs a separate report.
10 Likes
Some reports needed to be completely revised. Disregard earlier report posts from today. Thanks to @Mulatu_Astatke and @vizender some reports were revised and new ones were also created.
Rafale’s IRST should have maximum horizontal of 232 degrees // Gaijin.net // Issues
Rafale’s IRST should automatically search the total limits. // Gaijin.net // Issues
Rafale’s IRST should scan 232 degrees in 3-4 seconds. // Gaijin.net // Issues
Rafale’s IRST has incorrect vertical limits // Gaijin.net // Issues
Rafale’s IRST should have scan option of 160x67 // Gaijin.net // Issues
13 Likes
Welle that’s for recent stuff I remember back then when a lot of player tried to fix the mystère 2a, 2c and Super mystère when they were top tier plane.
They we’rent modified since then in fact the 2C model and 2 A model should be swapped, appart from the gun section.
I’m not even sure that the 2A was truly made.
Updated Bug Report List in the OP.
4 Likes
What the IRST should end up somewhat looking like
11 Likes
Maybe we’ll end up having 100+ reports by the end of next month unless devs get to a fixing frenzy.
1 Like
I like these much better than the CFTs
1 Like
+17 to +50 or -17 to +50
1 Like
-17 to +50, it’ll be a nerf in that regard.
The Rafale’s IRST sensor does not have animation. // Gaijin.net // Issues
The Rafale’s TV sensor does not have animation. // Gaijin.net // Issues
Incorrect Rafale cockpit animation duration // Gaijin.net // Issues
Rafale’s MAWS should have increased range. // Gaijin.net // Issues
Rafale’s MAWS should not detect flares // Gaijin.net // Issues
18 Likes
Forwarded.
For MAWS Increased Range additional references are needed.
18 Likes