Fair point here.
I just suspect that longer range range missiles likely dont get to use their long legs as much as ppl like to argue when you consider the effects of EW.
The MICA NG EM (AESA seeker) is set to be delivered and put into service by 2026, which would be before a Rafale F4 variant even came into the game let alone probably a J-20.
Does not mean the Rafale will come with such ordinance from the rip. Though yes I can see the Rafale F.4/5 variants using it against the J-20 by the time that ever comes to the game. There are also early blocks of the J-20 which are said to be far less stealthy and with only PL-12s without AESA radar seeker etc to compete against earlier Rafale.
There are “stealth” platforms that will compete with the Rafale at all levels I think.
Linked the dedicated MICA thread. I will add more pictures and color coding once I am done with majority of my planned Suggestions.
2 Likes
did it not have an HMD until F.4?
HMD maybe but def no HMS nor HMCS.
I haven’t looked into it much, and @WreckingAres283 can correct me, but there was compatibility for Rafale F.3 and I think greek ones had them.
that is quite surprising considering that things like the Hornet, Falcon or Eurofighter had that way earlier…
1 Like
Depends on what you mean by “way” earlier. F-16 Falcon didn’t get theirs until nearly mid-2010s. F-22 still doesn’t have it, it seems.
EF got its Striker 1 with Block 2B or whatever software update that is. Officially it entered service in 2009
Picture of an Pilot with Scorpion HMCS, a Rafale F.4.1 in the background.
6 Likes
Updated the thread;
- Added more color to titles and sub topics, as well as color coding for easier read and aesthetics
- Updated F.4.1 and F.4.2 with new information
4 Likes
A Rafale M “early” with just magics 2 would be very nice in the actual game without been a gamebreaker.
There’s something interesting here. The Swiss evaluation done in 2008 was looking at the performances of the Gripen, Eurofighter, Rafale in a 2015 configuration. So this meant they looked at what’s particularly relevant still today.
The Swiss has concluded that the Rafale outperformed both Eurofighter/Gripen in the detection and acquisition role as well as electronic warfare.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1059577365338009770/1143918037133701311/proxy.php.jpg
10 Likes
Rafale has long been known for its stellar avionics while Eurofighter still used an older style mechanically steered radar until recently. iirc first test ueing CAPTOR-E (the eurofighters AESA radar) was back in 2007, but i dont think they started even using said CAPTOR-E until recently.
I think this shortcoming initially came from disagreement in who would make what radar for the EF2000, as joint projects tend to have a lot of countries trying to support their own companies interests.
The assessment was taking into account possible 2015 configuration, and that may have included CAPTOR AESA. In fact, the assessment considered Eurofighters radar as being better than Gripen NGs AESA radar. I could only think that would be possible with Captor-E.
I highly doubt that actually. The text speaks of the Tranche 3 P1E configuration, which integrates Stormshadow. P1E also resulted in the the signing of a development contract for the CAPTOR-E radar, but it was not yet in production.
https://www.eurofighter.com/the-programme
It even specifies in the text that the majority of the Eurofighters upgrades were mainly for air to ground role, which the Eurofighter wasn’t really configured for at the time. CAPTOR-E was in development at the time sure, but they didn’t even start signing contracts for aircrafts with it until Kuwaits order in like, 2016?
If the P1E they spoke of in here actually had a major upgrade such as an AESA radar, it likely would’ve been mentioned alongside the expanded air to ground capabilities…
I think this summary and graph actually speaks to a few more interesting things seeing as the Rafale kind of came out of the gate with better avionics and multirole ability:
-
Typhoon A/C performance (which I assume stand for aircraft) is classified as the highest, and by a fair margin over the Rafale scoring a 9 vs the Rafale’s 7. Theres been a lot of contention around which aircraft is “better” flight performance-wise, with Rafale fanboys often citing the F-22 “kill” video as proof its better/the best, but this seems to indicate the Eurofighter actually exceeds it in that metric.
-
Gripen has Stellar EW for a “cheaper” alternative to the other 2 big Eurocanards, nearly matching the Rafale, and the Rafale is already quoted (by the Egyptians) to be able to brick a Su-35’s radar entirely.
-
The Rafale is stated to be substantially better at QRA which is interesting seeing as the EF2000 (atleast according to the wiki) has some rather nutty stated figures.
-
The Rafale, although the overall winner, doesnt appear to be so by much at all, which is interesting due to its previously mentionned vaunted avionics and sensors. The fact the Eurofighter with its mechanically scanned radar and the gripen with its lower cost model dont really fall off much in most respects is rather impressive.
Overall, my general takeaway from this is more that the Rafale benefitted greatly from ditching the Eurofighter program by being able to focus on their own specs without having parties at odd (which was a famously an issue with the Eurofighter, and is famously an issue with any joint program with France involved because they wanna make everything in their own homegrown industry and are non-compromising on the subject). This lead to the Rafale being a more “complete” multi-role fighter out the gate, but appears to be biting them in the rear as other nations have a greater budget and wider pool of expertise for development.
I think this points more to the Rafale being better than the gripen overall (being a larger and more expensive aircraft), but likely losing the “best fighter” crown in Europe as further developments in the Eurofighter program proceeded in the mid 2010’s and with the gripen still being impressive in capabilities for its pricepoint.
2 Likes
Can’t disagree with this. If it would have been getting an AESA radar, it would have been mentioned similarly as Rafale and Gripen was. That was an oversight by me.
I don’t know how you can come to this conclusion while admitting that out of all 3 configuration in the 2015, Rafale was the strongest. Furthermore, the Indian MMRCA also occured in the 2010’s and while the results haven’t been published yet, we do know the winner of that competition.
The greater budget and wider pool of expertise doesn’t help if it is bottlenecked by bureaucracy as you pointed out. It also doesn’t help that the same manufacturing countries vested with interest in the Eurofighter program are deprioritizing the plane and buying the F-35s.
1 Like
The 2015 configuration it spoke of it technically a theoretical one. The P1E came out a year early instead and the P2E and P3E followed shortly after further expanding the Typhoons ground attack capabilities, with things like the excellent Brimstone missile. The Rafale (atleast to my understanding) remains predominantly constrained to using French developed weapons as the French put a massive emphasis on defensive autonomy (one of the main reasons working with them on developments is so damn hard).
I’d also argue the CAPTOR-E is likely a better radar than the RBE2-AA the Rafale runs, as not only is it a newer design, but the CAPTOR-E is an AESA radar with mechanical steering as well, allowing it much better employment angles than a fixed AESA system like the RBE2-AA. IIRC this is also something the Gripen adopted prior to the EF2000’s Captor E
The old CAPTOR-M also didnt seem to perform substantially worse according to the grade structure, and I doubt the CAPTOR-E was a slight incremental step in performance that would still have the EF2000 behind the Rafale in avionics.
The Indian MMRCA was completed only a few years (jan 2012) after the swiss decision, and had reduced the competition to the EF2000 vs the Rafale as well before the decision was made. There’s also the consideration to be had about other factors than performance, with india having stronger ties to France, and still operating the M2K as well, so without knowing why india chose what it did, its pretty hard to determine much from that decision imo.
Problem is bureaucracy is much less relevant when the plane is already built, as thats the bulk of the difficulties and where the major contracts lie. The typhoon (atleast to my understanding) can carry a wider assortment of weapons and other subsystems, and isnt constrained to using primarily/only french developed systems, which I consider an asset.
As for the F-35 comment, I dont believe thats exactly fair either. The F-35 is a stealth fighter and is a much larger program than the Eurofighter in terms of adoption. IIRC, due to widescale adoption and iteration on the jet, its actual per unit cost is lower than that of both the Eurofighter and Rafale at this point. Even then though, the Americans are being rather problematic with the F-35 currently, with news of them intentionally slowing integration of the MBDA meteor along with other weapons that are direct competitors to their own developments.
The French on the other hand would never deprioritize the Rafale because of, as stated before, their goal of defensive autonomy. I think its likely to also kill their 6th gen joint development as well in the future as France never plays nice during development.
1 Like
No disagreement here. It’s very much possible the Captor-E is ahead of the RBE2-AA. I’d expect it to be so.
I have my serious doubts about the effectiveness of the Brimstone missile once it gets added into the game. The Brimstone missile is said to have a warhead weighing only 6kg. Gaijin has stated that in lieu of information stating exactly what the explosive weight is, they go with half of the warhead weight. That would mean only 3kg of explosives which is rather pitiful. Hellfires have 8kg of explosives and still regularly only crit tanks, let alone something like a Maverick which has a warhead of 50kg explosives and still often does crits on tanks.
The Brimstone is also said to be a terrain following missile as claimed by MBDA, unlike other modern Air to ground munitions. Despite having an active radar seeker, targets hiding behind a building/objects would have the missile overshoot when it is following along terrain.