I wouldn’t count the Pz.38’s if that’s what you’re talking about, Germany took over their factories during the war also there is more than one vehicle in the USSR if you include premiums, that actually include the Czechoslovakian flag.
It’s quite obvious what’s going to happen with Czechoslovakia, it’s going to be used as a filler, which by the way I disagree with, it’s just facts, maybe until if Gaijin decides they need their own tech tree, there are numerous options Gaijin could’ve picked from.
I didn’t know being part of NATO was a limitation for War Thunder, can you point to me where this is stated?
I find it funny that Russian need Gripen when they running around with mig-29 and su-27?
but wait if you ask me why German can have mig-29? it because they use them and put in Luftwaffe service even after reunification, so they actually use them.
and if you ask what about T-80U and MI-28A for Sweden and T-90 for Britain? well i can still say those are ridiculous decision made by Gaijin and I don’t like it too
I never asked why Germany had a MiG-29, must’ve been another individual, Germany used those. And yes there are ridiculous additions all around, what can we do about it.
That is irrelevant. Pz.35 & 38s were both Czechoslovakian designs. Russia will never have a sub-tree officially or in-officially, there no nation that “belongs” to them simply because they’ve got enough homemade designs for the most part. Discounting the Su-25, there’s only a single ‘indi’ CSR vehicle in the Russian TT, and just like the Hunter F.58, it was added to plug a “gap” at lower tiers. The gap is now gone, so tell me what else is there to this?
Aside from that, I do love how you just ignored other examples which include Canada & Switzerland, lol.
by their logic soviet/russian based vechicles shouldnt be in nato countries as they are outside of nato
I’ll bite and ask which ones you’re talking about @Mongaroth33
Except it not irrelevant, it’s a Czech design used by Germany, that’s totally different from the Czechs themselves using it, the vehicles themselves even have the the German flag on them in the statcard.
I don’t know, I asked if we’d see more Czech vehicles on the Praga dev blog and the response was maybe, so it’s still a possibility, maybe not as a sub tree but it’s definitely possible we’ll see more Czechoslovakian vehicles in the USSR research tree.
I don’t know, I asked if we’d see more Czech vehicles on the Praga dev blog and the response was maybe, so it’s still a possibility, maybe not as a sub tree but it’s definitely possible we’ll see more Czechoslovakian vehicles in the USSR research tree.
At this point I do have to ask, “Czech vehicles” as in the post-CW nation, or Czechoslovakia post-1945. The former is very much a no-go (especially once we include Western designs), the latter is doable due to majority of armoured & air vehicles used were of Soviet designs (just like the Su-25K and the “flag”, which is in this context irrelevant). Because you seem to be using “Czech” and “Czechoslovakian” like they’re one and the same.
You’re right, the vehicles which are being added are under the Operator country of “Czech Republic”. However we do have a single vehicle under Slovakia, that’s the T-72M2 Moderna, but that’s a event vehicle, so that doesn’t say much.
In case of the Su-25K that can make sense, as they inherited those aircraft from Czechoslovakia, alas it would make more sense to put them under “Czechoslovakia” instead. However if Prada has a flag of the Czech Republic then it’s a Gaijin-made error.
I’m guessing this post is because of the Czech Su-25k being in the Russian tree, but it’s in the Russian tree because the Su-25k is a Russian airframe, not because the Czech Republic has any meaningful ties to Russia.
