没想到苏联解体后俄罗斯的眼科医疗水平已经落后到如此地步了,令人叹惋啊
明确一下,是东欧地区
现在最奇怪的是130mm的FB10和FB10A(忽略后端30mm推键燃料),战斗部装药比90mm弹径的TY90导弹还要低一些是来搞笑的吗?这样不如还原TY90没有被削弱之前的机动能力和抗干扰能力算了
那能不能给图像锁定呢
开发团队能解释一下为什么90mm的95ya6的装药当量会是130mmFB10装药当量的八倍?难道开发团队就不认为他们给FB10的装药当量低到了一个非常可笑的地步?95ya6的装药当量甚至比239mm的9M331装药当量都大,反而FB10/FB10A只有区区不到2kg的装药当量,难道在游戏里,口径越小装药当量越大?这明显违背基本物理常识了,所以开发团队应该增加FB10/FB10A的装药当量
The CS/SA5 should have AHEAD ammo
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/VyiQ6ZriG07X, the existence of cs/bae5 ahead has been acknowledged. However, as community manager Monika_in_action mentioned in the forum: “The development team believes that it is necessary to supplement the ammunition programming device related materials”. However, it is not necessary to describe this programming mechanism in detail, and the following provides the reason and further evidence.
There are two separate video resources from different official media, the first one is from the official weibo account of China South Industries Group Corporation. Between the 30- to 40-second mark in the video, it is clearly visible that the ammunition exhibits characteristics similar to AHEAD technology.
Sina Visitor System (link to CSGC)
Sina Visitor System 2(backup link)
The second resouce is from cctv (China Central Television is the national television broadcaster of China)
This video provide more information about the new system, from 7:27, we can clearly notice the characteristics of ahead ammo, and the damage effect on the drone (7:50 in the video) gives further evidence. Last but not least, the subtitle at 9:51 clearly said:“It is also equipped with intelligent programmable ammunition”
All in all, these video resources was enough to prove that the cs/sa5 has the ability to use AHEAD ammo, there is no more need to explain the programming mechanism.
LY70系统也装备了FB10A导弹,但是装备在雷达车上,发射车装备的是LY70导弹,那么是不是可以认为FB10A的数据链完全可以集成到一台车上,而非需要多套载具组成的复合系统,那么对于远距离目标,FB10A可以依靠雷达提供的数据进行打击,而不是一定要依靠导弹自身的红外导引头。
从截图中可以看到LY70雷达车上就装备了FB10导弹
可以看到在这个issue中管理员认为视频中展示的是25mm炮的版本,可是实际上在Sina Visitor System 中可以看到由官方发布的cs/sa-5使用30mm炮的画面,在图中issue给出的链接为传说中的625,CS/SA5型30mm轮式自行高炮_哔哩哔哩_bilibili ,它与官方发布的视频是同一来源,这证实了在图中的issue所提供的证据是正确的30mm炮。所以Bug Reporting Manager的判断有误。希望得到纠正
在第一个视频链接中cs/sa-5使用30mm火炮的画面在第23秒出现
I believe that the development team mistakenly understood slant range as the maximum range, resulting in errors in the performance and design reference of these two missiles compared to reality, and affecting the data of power and resistance. I think the maximum range of these two missiles should be farther, that is, the maximum range of FB10 should be greater than 10KM, and FB10A should be greater than 18KM
That is to say, ‘射程’ is not ‘斜距’,and the maximum range is often farther than the slant range.Referring to the display board diagram of FM3000 and the introduction of HN-6, it can be seen that interception slant range is not the maximum range, and its definition is different in the Chinese context
关于FB-10和10A的重量问题,因为这俩弹重量相比直径来说过轻,出了动力段之后存能非常非常差。
目前游戏内的重量数据并不是非常合理,但是因为缺乏合适的参考数据,很难issue,情况提出来可以讨论下
作为比较,拿RIM-116系列比较,116系列数据来自美国海军官网,fb-10来自于拆包
至少说10和10a的差值应该小得多
同样1kg的装药也并不合理,参考116系列3.6kg的装药量
我注意到,当前测试服内FB10/10A导弹的TNT当量明显过小,我建议增加这两款导弹的装药质量以能够对中目标造成有效杀伤,issue链接如下: [DEV]TNT equivalent of the FB10/10A missiles is excessively low // Gaijin.net // Issues
建议补rim系列的例子,虽然rim用的就是响尾蛇的战斗部,然后那fb-10/10a的图片比划下说明战斗部差不多大,我就不再提交一次了
炮管长度还能影响车辆使用了ahead吗,尊敬的管理员您可以看看这个issues
Community Bug Reporting System 可以使用ahead炮管长度不是影响此弹药的关键问题,里面有包含ahead弹药使用以及之前的关键问题如何出发ahead
不要用那个视频里的,视频写的30打的是25,不是一个炮,现在单用那个论文配合弹药照片就行