I wonder how will people rate the CS/SA5 now that it has DL + LOAL on missiles.
I really want to improve the radar. I can’t believe that such a new air defense system doesn’t have radar target identification. I want to see if it’s an airplane, a helicopter, or a missile. (I really want to see the target model, whether it’s a Rafale, a Flanker, or an EF-2000)
It’s still mostly meh, all this change did was allow it to hit drones and helicopters past 4km.
The largest issue is still the slow missile with no energy to hit maneuvering targets
If they increase it’s weight, energy retention and speed it would be worth 12.0
Atm id put it on par or slightly lower than the TOR/HQ17
4 Likes
Im playing it in Sqb and ground realistic and I have to disagree.
This should not be played as a Pantsir or a IRST system, but as a LAV-AD.
Making use of the speed, smoke and using building as a cover, then being able to fire and forget a missile, makes this system not at all similar to a Pantsir that needs to keep its track up.
Therefor even tho the missile flight performance is a insult to what it probably is in real life, i still think it stands equal to pantsirs and Irst’s as a valid option for top tier anti air.
Also saying it has a lower performance than the TOR and HQ17 is blatenly just not true, not even the Spyder and the FlaRakRad deserves that honor.
You have to spend more effort to play the CS/SA5 because it’s harder to play. Of course with the right skills it’s equal to pantsirs and whatnot but that doesn’t make it a good vehicle.
Maybe only in anti-air way as LAV, but anything else? SA5 doesnt have mobility nor profile (it huge) to be as aggressive as LAV can
AHDEAD round can not intercept missiles when fire from the side of it, even it’s within 2km.
Another bug is back that after radar lock it wont fire FB-10A.
One of the worst parts about this SAM, which is preventing me from grinding it, is to see how the slightly better and more tolerable missile is locked behind a grind/paywall.
It’s the ONLY one of the new Sam’s thst needs to start off with a worse missile than the better available one, for some odd reason.
1 Like
Except it is true. The HQ-17 can easily kill anything between 2-10km and it can actually reach its max range of 15km
While the FB-10A can barely hit a moving jet past 4km
The only thing the CS/SA5 does better is it has a gun for self defense up close
And you have barely 30 games played in it and a negative KD and <50%WR
I have 120 games played a 2KD and >50%WR.
So no need to try and lecture me on how to play it
1 Like
The funny part is
There is no proof it can use the FB-10 missile
Since the FB-10 uses a smaller launch tube
So we have to grind through a missile it can’t even use
5 Likes
they added it just to make stock grind worse as much as they could, like they did with flarakrad giving it roland 3 as stock missile
1 Like
Gaijin still no buff? This vehicle is easily the worst of all the new SPAAs added
1 Like
…It literally got data link not long ago
1 Like
Tam sam kai spyder and elde are worse
1 Like
thats not a buff? its missiles are the worst ones at top tier?
The missile is still the worst
2 Likes
Comparing which vehicle is worse as a justification to not buff the vehicle is insane. This does not improve the game at all and divides the playerbase. If those vehicles are bad, they should be buffed too.
1 Like
I just said his statment is wrong
cant wait to see gaijin add another busted spaa to ussr they confirmed last blog and when it will smoke this vehicle by being at the same br, why cant they just fix it using people research if they cant find it themselves
2 Likes
Because they decline all the sources people provide them, they only accept the reports they want to accept so they can keep the vehicles in major nations better than the ones in minor nations because thats where their money is coming from
2 Likes