Is its name important? Isn’t the point that Gaijin is using a made-up performance? There are already posts that raise issues with CSSA5 performance that have been locked on the forum. Chinese players are now restricted to the Chinese area. Any post that raises CSSA5 performance issues anywhere else will be locked.
The dev blog already confirmed that it will use the fb10a
btw it is now getting a thermal imager but i just wanted to point this bug report out -_-
I don’t think the rear big one is man-portable
Forum is not the place to put bug reports, neither do abuse to Devs…
And anything about DEV server should be posted in here
China need HQ-11 or HQ-16. CS/SA5 useless.
All new spaas are usless maybe exept slamram
1 flare and the fb10a go to trash and cant see the helis over 3km xD so 12.0 equivalent spaa
For real??
The fb10a cant even be used. And btw it has the same irccm fov as every other new ir missile
The standard Chinese vehicle has the lowest degree of completion and the least working time. My game time is longer than the working time of the development team on this vehicle. BVVD dares to say in the live broadcast that his missile performance is good.
I blame the lack of interest on the unoriginal low tiers, i think the Chinese tree should have been like the Israeli one, would have been way more popular
Yes and the rocket loss too much energy so cant shoot any manouvering plane over 7km
This spaa can effective in 10.7 or 11.0 only not in 12.0 at the moment
this is so disappointing man
thanks to those who think this is good and are satisfied with it
Again youre talking about the fb10. The fb10a isnt even finished and you cant use it
I dont think youve seen all the bug reports that got declined for no reason
If the fb10a is added to spec, maybe a slight improvement to the radar, ahead and apds. Then this can easily be considered the best or a side grade to the best anti air in the game rn
“China pantsir equivalent” as they said on dev server lmfao XD
In they dream