The power of subtrees is simply amazing.
CM-11 Brave Tiger
CM-12
M48A3 (ROC upgraded)
M48H
M60A3 (upgraded)
Type 64
Type 65
Wan-Cheng (local prototype series)
CM-34 (IFV)
CM-33
CM-32 Clouded Leopard
CM-31 (prototype/early design)
CM-21 (IFV/APC family)
CM-25 (TOW carrier)
CM-27 (mortar carrier)
Thunderbolt 2000 (RT/LT-2000) MLRS
M109 (self-propelled howitzer — locally maintained/modernised)
M110 (heavy SP howitzer — in service/modernised)
M24 Chaffee
M41 Walker Bulldog
M47 / M48 series (Patton family)
M60 series (Patton)
Type 64 (local hybrid/light tank)
Type 65 (local design)
Wan-Cheng series
T92 SPAAG (Short range)
Sky Sword II Air-Defence Vehicle
Tien-Chien I SAM Carrier (already in game)
Tien-Kung Mobile Launcher (Would be a good top-tier SPAA)
M42A1 Duster (ROC upgraded)
MIM-72 Chaparral (ROC version)
Avenger-type Stinger Humvee Launcher (Taiwan version)
TC-2 SAM Truck Launcher
Tien-Kung I (Sky Bow I)
Tien-Kung II (Sky Bow II)
Tien-Kung III (Sky Bow III)
Tien-Chien I (Sky Sword I)
Tien-Chien II (Sky Sword II)
I think that all. There is more but it hard to find evidence of it
2 Likes
Taiwan subtree as a whole should to go Japan. PRC and ROC in the same tree is a joke
1 Like
It’s funny that US mains fall into the paradox of criticising a major part of what makes them a superpower (their global influence, especially when translated into war thunder)
1 Like
add Taiwan to Polish tech tree and the problem is fixed /j
2 Likes
and then add soviet vehicles to the us tree? definitely not
To solve the Vt-4 controversy, Thailand can join aswell
1 Like
You see that as a bad thing? The US was offering a superior product
A lot of Brits feel like if left to their own devices they could create a superior product.
Too much red tape there unfortunately
Taiwan is properly set under China.
3 Likes
No they weren’t
For what Britain and Europe were looking for the F-22 was the worst possible option on the market.
Its weaker than the EFT for QRA, and the F-22 has a fraction of the multirole performance the EFT has.
and why buy F-14, F-15, F-16 and F-18s they were also offering when the Typhoon is better than all of them as well.
There is an RAF document somewhere that was a review of the F-22 and it basically states as much. Whilst it acknowledges the F-22s performance in a very niche set of situations, its actually terrible in most of the roles the Typhoon excels at.
It the other way around.
Then you are telling me Japan will have the VT-… Oh wait.
to end this subject just name the TT True China and make China a sub tree in that TT
What about the IAI Lavi?
The US DoD shut down the Lavi project solely on the grounds that it would of been far more successful as an export project than the US competition (F-16) and forced IAI and the Knesset to cancel the project, in return for heavily subsidised F-16C/D models
1 Like
Why isn’t the world-renowned TURKISH ARMY included as a tree? It’s very interesting that you stubbornly omit the Turkish Army tree, which has played important roles in world history and NATO.
1 Like
The US did buy the Harrier.
and both the Tornado and Typhoon had/have long and succesful careers.
The Typhoon T4/T5s are looking to beat out pretty much every other aircraft on the market at the moment, meanwhile the F-22 is being retired from service.
I think you’re overselling it, just a tiny bit xD
shermans, m109s, m44s, m55s, f16s, f15s, f18s, m60s, m48s and what else more.