By the time we get one they will probably be filled lol
Well that is true, but it is also having least population , even being 9th largest by square meters…
And I would like it to be true, but there is plenty of times, when something even older is datamined and still not entered in game, and seeing how much love naval has gotten lately I wouldnt be surprised that it would be USS Indianapolis
genuine question, but what else can it be?
1 Like
Why the hell are the chinese getting an Abrams ?!
No VT-4 for Thai because they got mad. But now they’re gonna get a M1A2T ?!? What are these double standarts ???
7 Likes
This is GREAT.
Cant wait to play bouth of them more often BUT please @magazine2 @Smin1080p_WT or any other Mod tell the Devs to consider making the additional Track armor on the Turrets of the Tiger II B and the Tiger II (Nr.1-50) a modification like most German Tanks have (Panthers and Pz. 4s for instance) so we can choose if we want these on or not.
These bothered me on the Tiger II (Nr.1-50) remake a bit since these Track armor hides a bit of the Decals of bouth Market Place Camos for it.
I find these Model remakes would be the perfect time to implement this.
Idealy the same change could be made for the Tiger Is and Jagtiger in the Future.
12.0 ground use to be 10.0 ground.
The only powercreep that has occurred since 10.0 was top BR was when DM53 and M829A2 were added to the game… when 10.3 was top BR in ground. XD
@Raldi92
USSR doesn’t need an Indian serviced T-90S, or Mig-21Bison.
Those vehicles in the Soviet tech tree would be less unique due to being surrounded by other similar-vehicles.
I much prefer unique lineups with unique vehicles over bland lineups with unique vehicles.
I’ll even take copy-paste vehicles in unique lineups over unique vehicles in bland lineups.
This is a speculation, but I would guess that one variant of the Mosquito Bomber, you will be adding, will be the Mk IX.
If that is the case, can you please also include a skin for the specific Mosquito B Mk IX, LR503, best known as “F for Freddie”. It was the aircraft that flew the most combat operations of any allied bomber during the second world war.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
4 Likes
its okay the NK cant even complain
4 Likes
Both Koreas see themselves as Korea, it’s the same exact situation as China.
It’s quite literally the least controversial thing.
There are posts complaining about Taiwan getting its M1A2T… wild.
5 Likes
Korean tree has been my dream since modern vehicles were first introduced to War Thunder. I’ve wanted the K1, K1A1 and K2 more than anything else and I’m so excited now that we’ve finally got confirmation the tree is coming (though none of these vehicles are confirmed). Really pleased with this update.
3 Likes
i would see NK player agree
1 Like
Wasn’t this game meant to simulate semi-realistic tank battles? How do these nations fighting together make any sense?
Well as if gaijin cares anymore about whats real or not. Might as well be WoT 2.0
2 Likes
I’m all for Korean vehicles in the game I just think this is an awful way to add them.
1 Like
that’s same of the unique tanks Greece can offer they are more plus all the “copy and paste”
MOD NOTE: PLEASE USE SPOILERS.
4 Likes
Please do not add the Greeks united to Israel, Israel does not even need a sub-tree, they already filled it with 10,000 copies of Merkavas and F-16s,
2 Likes
I personally disagree, though I wouldn’t have been upset if they were split. I personally don’t like subtrees and would prefer full independent nations wherever possible so this is the best outcome for me.
exactly they need diversity
Before that fix the damm merkavas and namers
3 Likes
chally n leopard to israel
gulp
1 Like