I wasn’t talking about subtrees lol
Difference is 1 doesn’t have access to the internet
It worked for the Chinese tree.
Im completely okay with the sentiment that has been posted across Gaijin’s forums of pulling back all export vehicles and letting trees only be domestically made stuff. Lets pull back all the Shermans, M36s, Mustangs, F4Us, F-104s, F-86s, F-4s, F-16s, F/A-18s, and let nations just have their own domestically made vehicles. The F-2 can porbably stay since Japan got the license but just about every tree becomes a fraction of what it is besides the big three. Russia can do the same and there goes China until the mid to higher BRs.
Wanna say F-15 but only US, JP and Israel has that.
single addition vehicles makes even less sense if they are not connected to the nation like the leopard2pl
(IMO) Because its the best option to add both in a way, it would be most interesting for everyone - Nations like the USA and Russia do not need or even have enough space to fit such rather larger Nations TT’s and I don’t think fans of Korean equipment (incl myself) would be happy to see these sprinkled in small bits everywhere.
No, BR decompression is an unknown concept to Gaijin
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Lots of slop and like 2 good news. But what else to expect
They can’t without having to reimburse players for spending on vehicles but in time and money and you know the Snail isn’t going to give any money back to tens of thousands of players.
Sub-trees have always been and still are options. North Korea could go to Russia since it’s mostly Russian left overs.
That’s a great approach and honestly, it’s how all subtrees should had been handled from the start. It helps avoid anachronistic and immersion braking inconsistencies (like MiGs and T-90s in the GB tree) while still allowing for the inclusion of unique vehicles in the game. I hope the same standard will eventually be applied to the subtrees and vehicles that have already been implemented !
Awww, I had hoped for something more interesting like the YB-49 or 35
Or another goofy tank, but that already was off the table when I read the announcement
“hm i wonder what would happen if we made a VERY stupid decision after the drama with wanting to add a VT4 to japan through a subtree, surely nothing at all will happen right?”
A great approach would been to have just made ASEAN its own main nation.
The problem with Chinese tech tree is being treated unfairly for so many years. It seems the dev would response to requests on other nations much faster, went through easier than more likely to made the changes compare to Chinese tech tree.
Problems still remain including:
- Missing 4x AGM option loadout for JH-7A with picture reference been marked as “unfair to other nations” while remains the only nation with the least AGM loadout
- Missing laser jammer for ZTZ-99 family
- Modified armor model with reduced protection area leaving the idle wheels floating outside the hull for ZTZ96 and 99 family
- Reduced TNT equivalent for Chinese ammunitions (for example HJ-9 missile used on AFT09 uses “Explosive Type 88” which is made by Japan during World War I; all Chinese top tier bombs having explosive type “TNT” leaving reduced total equivalent compare to other nations)
- Missing proxy fuze on HN-6 missile on PGZ-04A with direct quote from exhibition during airshow been marked as “unreliable”
- PL-8B nerfed performance with data directly taken from official website marked as “unreliable”
-Missing fire-on-the move function with Tor/HQ17 with video reference been marked as “unreliable”
All of the above had issue tickets with photo/video/reference submitted at one point. The Chinese community would like a answer and response for all those leftover changes.
Hoping the dreams come true plane event is one of the early weird jet prototypes like the pulqui ii
that’s right,activity is the most important thing for a online game,so it’s impossible
If the dreams come true event isnt the Mig25 i will eat drywall and continue our drywall friends legacy