Idk if its just me, but the type 76 image appears to be broken?
I get what you’re saying but still i don’t agree, Algeria being “part of France” was forced and not chosen. Unlike Corsica which is French by will of the corsicans today, Algeria fought a bloody war for independence, so that’s not really the same thing at all… The parallel I drew with Poland and Korea was that the population refused foreign rule and resisted.
After independence in 1962 Algeria cut ties with French weapons and built its army almost entirely on Soviet/Russian equipment + later Chinese, South African, German etc. That’s why our doctrine, training, and gear today is way closer to Russia than France.
As for the Mirage having been tested also, I doubt it constitutes a solid argument for Algeria being in the french TT. Because Algeria also tested Tornadoes at some point (I learned this recently, to my great surprise!) and I honestly don’t see Algeria fitting the German TT for this reason either.
Also IMO about the Iranian F-14 example, yeah it looks weird but it still makes sense gameplay wise since Iran got them from the US directly back in the Shah era, that the Shah himself was a friend of the USA and they (iranian F-14s) remained American-made aircraft with American systems mostly. Algeria on the other hand doesn’t have anything french aside of Panhard armored cars.
So honestly if Algeria gets added it should ideally be as part of a united arab tree or at least in the Soviet TT as event/squadron/premium vehicles
1 Like
Soooo any updates on fixing the Tan Sam Kai bugs??? I’m not playing that thing till its fixed…
Type 21/FV101 Scorpion too!!
( Kinda a shame they never went for the later head lamps, the original ones always make the upper front look really bare imo.)
5 Likes
Hopefully “dump and burn” is modelled for the F-14 and Grippen like it is for the F-111.
It looks great in-game on the F-111 so hopefully the others will get it too.
1 Like
you might want to get your sources ready for the gripen as it wasnt mentioned directly
It was though?
oh nvm then
they didnt use JAS-39 so i didnt se any numbers while quickly looking at the text and ignored the gripen
Wish it would be Yavuz in 1940s, although it is not specifically ‘German’ battlecruiser at that point.
1 Like
And of course you will make scout drones easier to hit and destroy; they will not have pixel size hitbox.
Since you guys are fixing modules, how about adding the abrams gunshield armor that is completely missing from the game?
With more new SPAA incoming, do we think the UK will receive the Rapier FSC or Sky Saber?
Personally I wouldn’t mind the FSC, much more concealability along with optical and radar guidance. Maybe it could help redeem the Tracked Rapier as well lol
Why would you want a Rapier?
It’s the FSC, completely different to the Tracked Rapier
Well, yes but no. Same missiles, different radar. And multi vehicle.
I guess I just have a soft spot for it, especially after you know who butchered its introduction and subsequent “fix”. The FSC would also have access to upgraded missiles, the Mk. II A for standard SPAA and the Mk. II B which believe it or not has a tandem HEAT warhead what could be used against IFV’s and other SPAA systems
Mark 2A is the SAP one, it is not tandem HEAT, 2B is the proxy prefrag one, and we already haver it on the tracked rapier. They wont add 2A, as it would be pointless on such system, only rising the BR due to somewhat penetration capability. And if the penetration is bad, they would be pointless, too low pen to fight tanks, and impact only for planes. SAP intended use was always anti armoured helicopters.
When trailer/devlog?
A multiple placeable Rapier battery would be awesome for Britain (Not top tier) but very cool to have.