Community Update No.7: Talking About What’s Coming Soon!

Doesnt matter what was considered. Buddies going on about Algeria being part of France as if Algerians werent seen as sub-human and treated as such. If algeria is to be introduced it should be with USSR.

Algeria has nothing to do with france now, we operate mainly Soviet style equiopemnt or chinese. France has its own stuff, doesnt need our stuff in it too.

2 Likes

Hey, I definitely didn’t want to seem like I was saying France considering Algerian as sub humans wasn’t a thing. This is mainly what I was considering when I said Alergia had its reasons to fight for independance, and whatever some people might say to this day in France
I am also not saying that Algeria should be a sub of France. Personally, I only would like to see the Mirage F1 that Algeria tested as a potential vehicle for France. It did not actually entered service, and is a program developed by Algeria but with the help of France.
I was just saying that, in my opinion, the comparaison with other countries situation wasn’t quite right.
But, tbf, in general, the concept of subtrees is always going to be touchy. For European nations first with the issues of colonisation in general, Asia as well. Even the USSR sub nations is touchy with the ex soviets states for example

2 Likes

@Smin1080p_WT sorry to bother, but will the AIM-120C5 be fixed next update?

Thanks.

Idk if its just me, but the type 76 image appears to be broken?

I get what you’re saying but still i don’t agree, Algeria being “part of France” was forced and not chosen. Unlike Corsica which is French by will of the corsicans today, Algeria fought a bloody war for independence, so that’s not really the same thing at all… The parallel I drew with Poland and Korea was that the population refused foreign rule and resisted.

After independence in 1962 Algeria cut ties with French weapons and built its army almost entirely on Soviet/Russian equipment + later Chinese, South African, German etc. That’s why our doctrine, training, and gear today is way closer to Russia than France.

As for the Mirage having been tested also, I doubt it constitutes a solid argument for Algeria being in the french TT. Because Algeria also tested Tornadoes at some point (I learned this recently, to my great surprise!) and I honestly don’t see Algeria fitting the German TT for this reason either.

Also IMO about the Iranian F-14 example, yeah it looks weird but it still makes sense gameplay wise since Iran got them from the US directly back in the Shah era, that the Shah himself was a friend of the USA and they (iranian F-14s) remained American-made aircraft with American systems mostly. Algeria on the other hand doesn’t have anything french aside of Panhard armored cars.

So honestly if Algeria gets added it should ideally be as part of a united arab tree or at least in the Soviet TT as event/squadron/premium vehicles

1 Like

Soooo any updates on fixing the Tan Sam Kai bugs??? I’m not playing that thing till its fixed…

Don’t forget the ATGM TD, the BTR-3RK!

6 Likes

Type 21/FV101 Scorpion too!!

( Kinda a shame they never went for the later head lamps, the original ones always make the upper front look really bare imo.)

4 Likes

Hopefully “dump and burn” is modelled for the F-14 and Grippen like it is for the F-111.

It looks great in-game on the F-111 so hopefully the others will get it too.

you might want to get your sources ready for the gripen as it wasnt mentioned directly

It was though?

oh nvm then

they didnt use JAS-39 so i didnt se any numbers while quickly looking at the text and ignored the gripen

Wish it would be Yavuz in 1940s, although it is not specifically ‘German’ battlecruiser at that point.

1 Like

And of course you will make scout drones easier to hit and destroy; they will not have pixel size hitbox.

Since you guys are fixing modules, how about adding the abrams gunshield armor that is completely missing from the game?

With more new SPAA incoming, do we think the UK will receive the Rapier FSC or Sky Saber?
image


Personally I wouldn’t mind the FSC, much more concealability along with optical and radar guidance. Maybe it could help redeem the Tracked Rapier as well lol

Why would you want a Rapier?

It’s the FSC, completely different to the Tracked Rapier

Well, yes but no. Same missiles, different radar. And multi vehicle.

I guess I just have a soft spot for it, especially after you know who butchered its introduction and subsequent “fix”. The FSC would also have access to upgraded missiles, the Mk. II A for standard SPAA and the Mk. II B which believe it or not has a tandem HEAT warhead what could be used against IFV’s and other SPAA systems