Community Update No.7: Talking About What’s Coming Soon!

you might want to get your sources ready for the gripen as it wasnt mentioned directly

It was though?

oh nvm then

they didnt use JAS-39 so i didnt se any numbers while quickly looking at the text and ignored the gripen

Wish it would be Yavuz in 1940s, although it is not specifically ‘German’ battlecruiser at that point.

1 Like

And of course you will make scout drones easier to hit and destroy; they will not have pixel size hitbox.

Since you guys are fixing modules, how about adding the abrams gunshield armor that is completely missing from the game?

With more new SPAA incoming, do we think the UK will receive the Rapier FSC or Sky Saber?
image


Personally I wouldn’t mind the FSC, much more concealability along with optical and radar guidance. Maybe it could help redeem the Tracked Rapier as well lol

Why would you want a Rapier?

It’s the FSC, completely different to the Tracked Rapier

Well, yes but no. Same missiles, different radar. And multi vehicle.

I guess I just have a soft spot for it, especially after you know who butchered its introduction and subsequent “fix”. The FSC would also have access to upgraded missiles, the Mk. II A for standard SPAA and the Mk. II B which believe it or not has a tandem HEAT warhead what could be used against IFV’s and other SPAA systems

Mark 2A is the SAP one, it is not tandem HEAT, 2B is the proxy prefrag one, and we already haver it on the tracked rapier. They wont add 2A, as it would be pointless on such system, only rising the BR due to somewhat penetration capability. And if the penetration is bad, they would be pointless, too low pen to fight tanks, and impact only for planes. SAP intended use was always anti armoured helicopters.

When trailer/devlog?

A multiple placeable Rapier battery would be awesome for Britain (Not top tier) but very cool to have.

As it is along with Buk&SAMP/T, logically it would be Sky Sabre.

TBF it could also be the SANDF Umkhonto SAM system. Which would also be nice, IR guidance vs CAMMs ARH guidance and all that.

What benefit do 13.3 F16s give?

I see a worse F16 that has to fight vs the same 14.0 that the F16C already does.

Plz make it make sense for everyone other than the handful of people who are actually happy with dead F16s…

I think with the new BR changes adding 13.3 and 14.3 Bracket they should give the F2A TT AAM4B (which is in the works already) and make it 14.0 , while the ADTW would be nice to receive the regular AAM4 and be upped to 13.7 or 13.3 since we will already have AIM-120A at 13.3 on the F16 ADF variants

Likely not for another week, based on past years

It’s a shame that this criticism only applies to France.
Now when Indian and South African vehicles go to GB, no one says anything.