True
Personally I hope we get some Thai modification like their upgraded M163 and wooden add-on armor for the M60A3 TTS.
Would be disappointing of they just chose basic C&P variants when they only add 4 Thai vehicles this update anyways.
True
Personally I hope we get some Thai modification like their upgraded M163 and wooden add-on armor for the M60A3 TTS.
Would be disappointing of they just chose basic C&P variants when they only add 4 Thai vehicles this update anyways.
Absolutely
I’m sick of Patton slop, but if we get the TIFCS I will be satisfied
It is.
Neither should have been added. Japan doesn’t even lack SPAA at those BRs.
Knowing Gajin, they’re prolly gonna be 100% identical in everything except for camo.
most obvious rage bait
So what’s coming for Japan? We’re bringing in the Commando Stingray, M60A3 TTS, M163
We do really hope that the M163 and M60A3 TTS are Thailands unique modified variants, which don’t even require a lot of remodelling work;
poll M60A3 TIFCS - Royal Thai Army’s Renovated Hitter [grafik] Hi and welcome to my 38th suggestion, which is about the Royal Thai Army’s M60A3 TIFCS, hope you like it. [:popcorn:] First of all: This is a suggestion for a Vehicle we could see in game at some point in the Future , that doesn´t mean next Patch or somewhere in the near Future Feel free to share more Information and / or correct me if something is wrong Discuss respectfully, any aggressive kind or verbal abuse will be reported…
poll Introducing [image] M163 Thailand Vulcan Air Defense System (TVADS) “Super Vulcan” SPAAG Royal Thai Army’s Upgraded M163A1 VADS Thai Designation: ปตอ. 20 มม. วัลแคน อัตตาจร แบบ M163 A1 [20mm Self Propelled Anti-Aircraft Gun Vulcan Type M163 A1] [image] M163 Thailand Vulcan Air Defense System (TVADS) Super Vulcan During the Royal Thai Army’s Rapid Combat Readiness Training, 2020 OVERVIEW With the USA’s retreat from Vietnam in 1972, the previous commitment by the USA to help…
Agreed, it would be a shame to lose out on those two for the TT. Way more inspired additions than just C&P the standard variants of each into the Thai Sub TT
For the T-64 and T-80 series, the autoloader module will be refined, and a new element reflecting the conveyor mechanism will be added above the turret ring. This new element will retain the same functionality of the autoloader module we have already, and will effectively make it easier for the autoloader system to be disabled. The vertical and horizontal drive models have also been refined, they are now more accurate and in general will take up a little more space inside the tank.
lol @ people who still cry Russian Bias in 2025
Add spall liners to Chinese top tier mbts
I wonder what BR the ADF falcons will be? They dont get TWS as far as i know, and it wasnt explicitly stated they will get AIM-9Ms, nor do they have DL, which would be a rather large issue for the current meta.
I’d imagine they would be 13.3 or so.
At top tier I’ll agree sure, but at BRs like 10.7 (A popular one) where the AAs are either gun based, or early missile based, it’s not uncommon to see multiple AAs fail to kill the drones whilst they go on to scout the entire team. Take the ozelot for example. The missile doesn’t start turning quickly enough to engage em at the ranges they’re often found at. Even something like the Roland may have trouble in closer-range maps. Also, how TF is a light tank supposed to kill a drone? Especially if it doesn’t specifically have a HE-VT shell?
Also, I’d disagree with you about the fact that scouting the entire team adds “dimension”. Having to use your ears, eyeballs, and map knowledge is arguably more engaging and multidimensional than having arcade markers all over your screen telling you where the enemies are. At the very least the scouts should be restricted to map view.
Oplot is.
it is not, as much as i like oplot thailand didnt order nearly as many as vt4s and theyre unlikely to get any more anytime soon. on the other hand vt4 will reach 100ds soon
The better question is why did the F-18C get the AIM-120C in the first place? Typically worse platforms don’t get better missiles. Airframe performance is supposed to correspond with missile performance per Smin.
i dont really know what smin said, i doubt he said such a stupid thing. there is no such thing as “aircraft perfomance corresponding with missile perfomance”.
f18s are the weakest 14.0s by a landslide.
Did the F-16A ADF in American service ever actually carry AMRAAMS? Weren’t all the ADFs used by the US retired right after the Cold War ended and converted into non-ADF models IIRC?
Amount does not matter and has never mattered.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
More t80 nerfs, great, as if it wasn’t already one of the worst top tier tanks to play.
as if it wasn’t already one of the worst top tier tanks to play.
it seems you haven’t ever played any chinese mbt. while you get an almost completely invincible front every chinese top mbt is a free kill basically everywhere frontally, if there isn’t ERA then it’s a pen. gaijin clearly gimp every chinese system (as shown by fb-10a only reaching at best 8km) and it’s quite obvious
Sorry but anyone that actually PLAYs the game would want to get RID of nukes altogether, as they are breaking a core gameplay mechanic that is called TEAM vs TEAM pvp, and not I JUST SCOUT and KILL enough to be able to SKIP playing the game as intendet.
Dont tell me u think that nukes make the game better lol.
They didnt needet to prevent nuke TKs because everyone wanted to end their battles.
Nukes are ridicilus easy to get if ure PLAY the game as a PVP game and not just a tank driving around simulator.
The Oplot wouldve been ordered in larger numbers if Ukraine delivered them on time - certain border intrusions prevented that and of course that meant Thailand had to look for an alternative
And what are you smoking what? Amount acquired never mattered in this game. We have prototypes, unfinished one off prototypes, and main line stuff all the time.
Edit: Yes technically the VT-4 would be the main MBT in service. They really should add it.