I would assume more than 2 at least consdidering “several” implies more than 2 and while im surprised Sweden seem to be getting another SAM/SHORAD system I kinda wish they placed more emphasis on the nations that ACTUALLY need new SAMs or there first SAM cough Japan, Israel & Italy.
Russia certainly dont need a new SAM and that much is blatantly obvious
Something I’ve openly agreed with being added to every tank that has one.
Regardless of what you believe in my posts, I am at least going to conduct my own tests with it to see how it actually comes into play oppose to taking a random youtubers word for it.
They never said it was a nerf at all they said it was to prevent round essentially passing through crew compartments doing nothing, because IRL if you slam a 120mm dart into the side of the tank it tends to mess it up.
its been tested already and brought up I believe on the post about the baskets that people were taking one video and making it out as if it was happening everytime the tank got hit
That would not stop Gaijob
Unsure but I am aware it needs a FCS Vehicle to fire + its ARH
It doesn’t need the FCS vehicle to fire the ARH missiles, it’s only needed for datalink lock on after launch and search functions. The ARH missiles otherwise can be used in the same way that the lightwave version already can.
For missile performance it’s the same missile, only with a PESA radar seeker. It’s more pointy, which means less drag so it’ll bleed speed lower and perform to its stated effective range of 14km.
The missile doesn’t have the optical seeker anymore, it’s replaced with the radar one.
Yes, it can still use the KCU to designate targets. It can also fire without a lock and have the missile self search for a target, same as the lightwave missile, but this would need to be a new feature added to the game.
Oooooo
Side note I saw on some Type 81’s theres a little camera like thing on the top
do uk what that is?
looks like a sight or something
I feel like I absolutely have to ask, how can It possibly be stated that they do not want to add the Leclerc prototype as a premium due to lack of armor knowledge while the premium Ariete is in the game, nothing at all is known about its armor so it was just decided to give it worse armor then most WWII tanks and just got added like that no questions asked? Why wasn’t It tech tree then? Because if we ever get information about the Arietes armor then the value is going to skyrocket. The way I can tell is because it weighs about 20 tons less than the SEP V2 and has only 230 less HP, and yet its still slower even while having 24 PTW ratio while the Abrams is 21. The only reasonable explanation is it having minimum more armor than a Tiger II.
I’m seeing ALOT of talk about china and Germany getting SPAA similar to the pantsir for balance and may be the IRIS-T. Just want to point out that Germany, Russia and China are usually always on the same team so if they are all on SPAA it’s going to be insanely difficult for CAS players.
I was really looking forward to a premium leclerc too. France is a nation I want to grind.
when is the dev server released for the major update?
Done
You may have wrong, I wasn’t saying the Leclerc should be premium, but rather that the premium Ariete also shouldn’t be a premium based on what they said. Personally I think premiums ruin the matches and make my high tier games impossible to get into without a ton a level 10s playing a ridiculously high BR without experience. Im sure theres many more premiums that could also contradict the logic behind their decision but as an Italy main the Premium Ariete is all that came to mind.
So guessing Type 625 and a Eldenhet 98
Cool but isn’t the Eldenhet 98 kinda lacking both range and missile amount?
Blud we didnt even got the first dev blog
Appearance is the definition of not copy-paste, cause people don’t understand research goes into vehicles to even determine if they can be copy-pasted let alone commission a new model.
Cause if people claim gameplay = copy-paste then I bring up how that argument makes M1A1 and Leclerc copy-pastes of each other and so far no one has liked when that valid critique was used against the bad vague definitions.
Either way a 2A4 premium means more unique vehicles in tech tree.
Yeah, another leopard is ‘meh’, may as well just play Germany or Sweden then.
It feels incredibly lazy. There’s nothing wrong with a premium lerclerc that would just be a copy of a TT one with another skin.
the BR is their issue but now we got another situation.
They claimed a nerfed round Leclerc would at 11.7 would be alone in a lineup.
Yet simultainiously announced hte addition of a prototype leclerc (which means)
It must either be 12.0 sitting with the other leclercs or sitting by itself at 11.0. 11.3 or 11.7
all of which means their excuse for not adding a nerfed premium one is extremely cheap and overall poor. AS they could of added it at 11.7 and the proto leclerc at 11.7 (unless they mean a leclerc prototype that is modern AF) which seems ridiculous to me
By whos standards?
By all intents and purposes if its modules are identical, its ammunitions, and ofc model short of the actual textures ontop of it, then its copy & paste.
If the percentile of it that is new, aka the skin outweighs the rest, modules, modifications and ofc the actually statistics then it isnt copy paste.
however it is infact copy paste.
