It is not a perfect premium by any standard at all.
Why the heck is the “high tier” a German leopard 2A4?
As I stated above their post contradicts itself, either theyre going to add a prototype Leclerc at 12.0 Or they are going to add it at 11.3 which means a premium leclerc with a nerfed roudn would of been fine.
I guess we just have different ideas of what a perfect premium is then. I’m of the opinion that the Leopard 2A4, being a well-rounded, fairly balanced, and flexible tank that has stood the test of time in-game, fits well as a premium for France, especially as the tech-tree NL-variant already exists. I prefer C&P premiums over actually unique premiums, as it in my opinion is more fair towards free-to-play players to keep the unique vehicles available to everyone via the tech tree.
The tanks a good tank thats not in question.
What im refering to is this.
We should not be encouraging or allowing Copy and paste to be thrown into the game , especially when they already stated they had another idea in mind.
This argument falls apart when theres already 4 or 5 of the vehicles in a tree.
Unlike say, the Type 74G which is actually a unique, and the best iteration of the Type 74 yet is a prem.
The NL tree is another can of worms in of itself which many of the french players are quite disenchanted with, as rather than fix the leclercs with the plethora of reports they infact chose to C&P 3 leopards into the French ground tree. never mind the Air tree.
The Best top tier for france now is arguably a leopard 2a6 -.- and when the 2a7 or 8 whatever one NL use comes to france, it will inevitably be better than all the leclercs. thus why bother with it at all when you can just go for germany.
The Addition of a 10.7 premium leopard 2a4NL is literally rhere to justify the existence of hte TT version of it, 100 percent.
EDIT : the fact people are defending the Copy and paste of tanks (regardless of premium or not) is bonkers.
Like CR2OES , that should not have been implemented the way it is