Community Update No.6: Updating You On Some Things You Can Expect in the Near Future!

[An_Pigeon]

Whatever you say chief.
Ive got about 350 games between my abrams and Leopards since the update and they do survive substantially more.
Same as type 90 does with the extra modules.

Dont care what you doubt.
Rather it take out my turret basket than wipe the crew.

[MokaMoki]

Subsequently dont care that you think its a buff. The intent of it from the developers themselves was for it to be a nerf. “We don’t want to punish players for doing something right…” (by shooting in an incorrect area so obviosuly they didnt something right). And the sentiment around it is still negative. Calling a spade a spade here. You are welcome to disagree.

[CorruptShadows9-live]

@magazine2

after that, naval fans will be able to enjoy a naval vehicle in a naval event.

Yippee, remember back in the original devblog they said they plan to have a standard rotation from tank-plane-ship and they broke that literally the second cycle? And alongside that making it a full 1 month break so they have to wait until August to get some dingy little boat. Hell, I assume this means we won’t be getting a Summer Extreme? (I can’t remember if we got one in 2024)

@magazine2

next major update will be bringing in some superior, iconic, big, vast and yottabyte ships.

@magazine2

we also spoke about more advanced SAM system vehicles at top tier for ground forces coming in 2025.

However, this is peak

@magazine2

the fuel can catch fire

Please let this act like Napalm, I really want to mess around with this and if you give it the ability to damage airframes it will create some of the greatest potential moments of pure stupid

[YeeT_and_Delete]

They did say they are working on multi-vehicle SPAAs.

@magazine2

Q: In Ground Realistic Battles, top attack aircraft are capable of dominating ground vehicles for the most part. Are there any plans to do something about this in 2025?
A: According to our data, the balance at the top ranks of ground battles is noticeably shifted towards aviation and helicopters, and this balance has become even worse with the introduction of top aircraft this year. The situation where aircraft can attack tanks from a safe distance with impunity makes gameplay more boring for aviation and less fair for ground vehicles, a similar situation is with helicopters equipped with long-range fast ATGMs, or “fire-and-forget” ATGMs.

To counter these types of threats, more powerful systems are needed that have the ability to fire at several targets at once and a wide search sector in both azimuth and elevation. The most advanced SAM system currently presented in the game only partially meets these requirements, so we’ll move towards heavier systems for all nations, including those components of which are located on several chassis. Of course, we’ll have to solve the problem of controlling these types of SAM systems, but we’re already having thoughts on the matter.

[Blouck]

@magazine2

So what solution have we come to? We plan to introduce a Leopard 2A4 NL from the Netherlands as a premium for the French ground forces tree. It will come with some cool and distinct visuals. This is a reliable and proven MBT that will serve the premium role well, while allowing us to retain the Leclerc MSC prototype for the research tree and offer further support for lesser populated Battle Rating ranges. Both of these tanks are planned to come together in the next major update.

Once again, Gaijin is making a mockery of France and global players. They don’t know what to do, so they copy and paste the Leopard 2A4 as for all the other nations, because they don’t care about offering a unique premium vehicle for each country.
I hope it will be removed from the game in the next patch because nobody wants that tank again.

Especially since, at worst, there is a Vextra prototype with a 120mm to make a premium top tier

Vextra POLE

poll Hello everyone, Today, I’d like to introduce the final and most enigmatic member of the Vextra family: the Vextra POLE, equipped with the FER turret. “FER” stands for “Faible Effort de Recul,” which translates to “Low Recoil Effort.” This 120mm turret later lent its name to the entire turret series. [image] Before diving in, I’d like to clarify that while the initial version of the FER turret was essentially a shell, equipped only with the autoloader and gun, it was later upgraded with a…

[LuckyGunner]

@quartas121

Iconic ship= Iowa? Yottabyte = Yamato?

I think you’re right, let’s see the full sentence:

@magazine2

And that’s definitely true, as the next major update will be bringing in some superior, iconic, big, vast and yottabyte ships.

Let’s see if I can guess the other ones…

Superior: Sovetsky Soyuz-class battleship
Iconic: Iowa-class battleship
Big: Bismarck-class battleship
Vast: HMS Vanguard
Yottabyte: Yamato-class battleship

I hope it will also bring something for France and Italy (trying to find relevant adjectives)

[Grantaire]

wanna bet they’re all gonna be 7.0?

[An_Pigeon]

@MokaMoki

We don’t want to punish players for doing something right…” (by shooting in an incorrect area so obviosuly they didnt something right).

This statement completely contradicts itself you do realise that?

@MokaMoki

And the sentiment around it is still negative

The sentiment is not negative at all.
They did not want to punish players for shooting a tank in the spot that would IRL wreck half the tank.

@MokaMoki

Calling a spade a spade here.

Your calling what you want a spade and claiming it as gospel buddy.

the Turret baskets have overall lead to an increase to tank survivability, may get crippled but you survive which is a good thing

[heenio]

Can you guys update us about this topic? More In-Depth 3d Tank Customization

Will this ever be implemented, it’s my dream to take off those ugly rubber sheets from my t72. It’s all i want from this game

[Ghostmaxi]

Overall nice, i dont care for it except Berlin update.
And i hope for custom belts and look forward to all WW2 and pre.

[An_Pigeon]

So they are going back on what they said, i see

[Apvalus]

The new Chinese-made Type 625 mobile anti-aircraft weapon system.

[Caernarvon02]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[Joke_MaN]

Ayo, im so hyped for Type 625E

[Rowiek]

@magazine2

In December’s Q&A, we also spoke about more advanced SAM system vehicles at top tier for ground forces coming in 2025. The next major update will see several of these new systems come to the game for several nations at once.

“For several nations”.

Why not ALL nations?
Why should some nations not be able to protect themselves from long range aerial guided munitions and planes?
Why keeping long range protection a luxury for just surtain nations?

I think we all know which nations arent going to get better SPAA - the nations who are currently already lacking SPAA (long range).

[An_Pigeon]

@Rowiek

I think we all know which nations arent going to get better SPAA - the nations who are currently already lacking SPAA (long range).

Japan strugglin with the Type 81 at 11.7 man xD

We genuinely need massive decompression across the game

[Fanta_3412]

@Rowiek

I think we all know which nations arent going to get better SPAA - the nations who are currently already lacking SPAA (long range).

Try to guess which nation for sure will

[Rowiek]

US, GB, RU, ZH, DE

Russia gets 2

The rest probably next year.

[_CrusaderKnight]

I think the negative feedback about the upcoming Leopard 2A4NL premium is unjustified. It’s a perfect premium, providing players with faster progression of the tech tree and with in-game economic winning, all without introducing a new, unique vehicle locked behind a paywall.
The Leclerc MSC being tech tree is great news, as it therefore will be available to all players of the French tech tree.

Sammanfattning

I suspect the negative feedback would be far greater if the Leclerc MSC was announced as the upcoming premium for France, given how unique it most likely would be in the tech tree, both in terms of BR-placement and performance. That’s just speculation though.

[maguumo]

@Rowiek

“For several nations”.

Why not ALL nations?
Why should some nations not be able to protect themselves from long range aerial guided munitions and planes?
Why keeping long range protection a luxury for just surtain nations?

I think we all know which nations arent going to get better SPAA - the nations who are currently already lacking SPAA (long range).

So many negative nancies here. We don’t even know what they’re adding, we just have two vehicles identified. Maybe it’s limited to longer ranged, IR based SAMs, in which case there is nothing that can be added to some nations like Russia or the US. Maybe they’ll include new radio command or even active radar SAMs.

@_CrusaderKnight_

I think the negative feedback about the upcoming Leopard 2A4NL premium is unjustified. It’s a perfect premium, providing players with faster progression of the tech tree and with in-game economic winning, all without introducing a new, unique vehicle locked behind a paywall.
The Leclerc MSC being tech tree is great news, as it therefore will be available to all players of the French tech tree.

I agree, I’d much rather have the MSC in the tree. Though I’d prefer no high tier premium for France at all, haha.