Community Update No.6: Updating You On Some Things You Can Expect in the Near Future!

[SpeclistMain1]

@Master_Teaz

Fast Battleships?

s, i, b, v, y: 19, 09, 02, 22, 25? Idk if the numbers have any meaning outside of WWII being in the 1900s

[Master_Teaz]

@Michael-IR

@SoloWing_Makarov

So, I’m seeing 16 and 4 GBU-39s

here’s a photo of 4 of them on the other wing

now do you have any evidence to say that the 16 on the belly and the 4 on each wing cannot be carried at the same time?

[Markus_Kruber]

Really disappointed about the Leopard 2A4 premium, please just give us something like a leclerc with a camo net, another Leo 2A4 copy paste is not the way to go.

[maguumo]

If we’re getting IRIS-T SLS and a chinese IR SAM with ~17 km range Israel will probably get something too.
I don’t know why you list a four times larger M163 though, that thing would be atrocious.

[LightningMoon33]

Please do not “Calm down” me. I am simply frustrated from the lack of care to the Israeli tree thats all.

And i can and will anticipate Israel will be left with a bad option for a SPAA.

[Braindit1234]

18km.

[mm10000]

[SoloWing_Makarov]

@Master_Teaz

evidence to say that the 16 on the belly and the 4 on each wing cannot be carried at the same time?

Evidence that something can’t be done? Idk, it’s up to claimer to proof the stuff he’s saying. I’m still not seeing 24 gbu-39s on one plane flying.

[VictorKorp99]

@magazine2

Afterwards, those interested in aircraft will be able to appreciate one of Kurt Tank’s designs in the aircraft event

Please Gaijin Pulqui II, I want but man I don’t wanna make high hopes for it lol

[Rambolf]

Please gaijin

[Bruce_R1]

I mean, it could be the Marut, too.

[Master_Teaz]

there’s no evidence that it Can’t be done, its clearly compatible with each Pylon, and the GBU-39 is never going to exceed a weight limit on the A-10, there is no reason for the 24x GBU-39 configuration not to be possible. If you have any reason other than “I don’t see 24 at once” feel free to share

[Real_K_Soze]

@magazine2

Afterwards, those interested in aircraft will be able to appreciate one of Kurt Tank’s designs in the aircraft event.

In case somebody want to see a list of his designs (wikipedia):

Aircraft designed by Kurt Tank for Focke-Wulf

• Fw 44
• Fw 56
• Ta 152
• Ta 154
• Ta 183
• Fw 187
• Fw 189
• Fw 190
• Fw 200
• Ta 254
• Ta 283
• Ta 400
• Project I
• Project II
• Project III
• Project IV
• Project V
• Project VI
• Project VII
• Project VIII

Post-Second World War

• FMA I.Ae. 33 Pulqui II
• FMA I.Ae. 35 Huanquero
• FMA I.Ae. 36 Cóndor
• HAL HF-24 Marut

---

Whilst i hope that gaijin will implement (finally) the Fw 190 A-9 with the 2.000 hp 801 TS engine (>900 built) with an actual usable flight model and way more realistic agility, i expect that we will see a jet…

[EL_CONTRA]

keep it even… should be “Malvinas” map.

[stuka2689]

Everything looks fine, except for premium Leopard 2A4NL. We have 11.7 premiums in the game, It shouldn’t be that difficult to make premium leclerc.
And not a single news for a ‘promised’ unique addition for Hungarian air. Or even Benelux.

[CorporalApollo-psn]

@Morvran_

FINALLY A NEW AIR EC MAP!!!

Could it also be bigger than the current max size?

But either way, this is so long overdue, this awesome!

I doubt we’ll see it in EC.

[Master_Teaz]

In Spanish it would be

[VictorKorp99]

Both names, one for each language as both names are recognized

[An_Pigeon]

@magazine2

Talking about a top-tier French premium tank

We’ve seen many questions and requests for a top rank premium tank for the French tree, and today we’re ready to provide some information and our thoughts regarding this.

We previously mentioned the challenges of finding a suitable candidate that fits a populated Battle Rating with other vehicles possible in its lineup. This is an important consideration when we look into including a premium vehicle in the game — we look into other vehicles that could fit into a lineup with it.

We have plans to add a prototype variant of the Leclerc in the next major update, however not as a premium. The reason for this is that its armor protection is still under question, and we’re wary of adding a premium vehicle with armor that could very much be subject to heavy changes if new information came to light. The specific variant of the prototype is still being worked on and is planned for the main research tree, where potential drastic changes to armor and Battle Ratings are more tolerable than if it was a premium vehicle.

To reiterate, we don’t want to add premium vehicles at the highest possible Battle Rating, so a premium at 12.0 for ground forces is not possible at the moment. With this in mind, we looked into another consideration as well. This included some form of a production Leclerc as a premium, but without a top round so that it could be placed at a lower Battle Rating. However this vehicle would have no lineup of its own and would only be valid in toptier 12.0 lineups, where it would be at a disadvantage with a weaker round.

So what solution have we come to? We plan to introduce a Leopard 2A4 NL from the Netherlands as a premium for the French ground forces tree. It will come with some cool and distinct visuals. This is a reliable and proven MBT that will serve the premium role well, while allowing us to retain the Leclerc MSC prototype for the research tree and offer further support for lesser populated Battle Rating ranges. Both of these tanks are planned to come together in the next major update.

This is beyond silly.

• Not only is it blatantly copy and pasting a Leopard 2a4

• It also shows you have no issue leaving all the leclercs at 12.0 when most of them are 11.7 tanks.

• Please stop copy and pasting.

• fix lineups for most trees.

• stop

[An_Pigeon]

They call themselves the Falklands internationally.

THough it should include both or not be added.